Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to warpdotdev/oz-for-oss. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/main/.agents/skills/update-pr-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/warpdotdev/oz-for-ossWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/update-pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/update-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/update-pr-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01334 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00667 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00267 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
update-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Update PR Review
Use this skill to improve the repo-local review companions .agents/skills/review-pr-local/SKILL.md and .agents/skills/review-spec-local/SKILL.md from real reviewer feedback. The shared review-pr skill and the repo-local core .agents/skills/review-spec/SKILL.md are the cross-repo contracts and are read-only from this loop.
The repository uses two separate review skills: review-pr for code pull requests and review-spec for spec-only pull requests (PRs where every changed file lives under specs/). Feedback from each category of PR should be routed to the corresponding repo-local companion.
Write surface
This self-improvement loop may only write to:
.agents/skills/review-pr-local/(andSKILL.mdinside it).agents/skills/review-spec-local/(andSKILL.mdinside it)
It must NOT touch:
- the shared
review-prskill .agents/skills/review-spec/SKILL.md(the core contract)- any file under
.github/issue-triage/(that taxonomy is owned by theupdate-triageloop) - any other core skill
The self-improvement runner enforces this via a git diff check against allowed prefixes before pushing. A violation aborts the run.
Inputs
- Optional repository override if you are not running from the target checkout.
- Optional time window override when you need something other than the default seven-day lookback.
- Optional agent-login override if the review comments were not authored by the default bot identities.
Workflow
- Verify GitHub CLI auth:
gh auth status
- Aggregate the feedback for pull requests updated over the last week with the bundled script:
python3 .agents/skills/update-pr-review/scripts/aggregate_review_feedback.py
By default this targets the current repo, looks back 7 days, and analyzes review comments authored by the bot identities used by the PR review workflow (warp-dev-github-integration[bot]). It also collects broader human review comments from those PRs so the skill can learn from reviewer norms even when they were not replying directly to the bot. The script writes structured JSON to a temporary file and prints the temp-file path. Treat that file as scratch state for this skill, not as a user-facing deliverable or final output. If you need a repository other than the current checkout, pass --repo owner/name. If you need a different author identity, pass --agent-login <login> one or more times.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 100 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 3a1ba76f8cb1
update-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository warpdotdev/oz-for-oss (307 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,334 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…