Warp is an agentic development environment built around a terminal, combining a coding agent with tools for software development and team workflows. Developers can use its built-in agent or connect external CLI agents, while teams can define and deploy software factories in code.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to warpdotdev/warp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/warpdotdev/warp/master/.agents/skills/tui-verify-change/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/warpdotdev/warpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/warp/tui-verify-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/warp/tui-verify-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warpdotdev/warp/tui-verify-change/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/warp/tui-verify-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warpdotdev/warp/tui-verify-change.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 5 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 283 Tool calls are chained to bypass individual safety checks or escalate capabilities beyond what any single tool call would allow.Fix: Limit tool chaining depth and validate the output of each tool before passing it to the next. Require explicit user approval for multi-step chains.
- medium Privilege Escalation · line 283 Commands invoke sudo or root privileges. Verify this elevated access is necessary and justified.Fix: Avoid sudo/root unless strictly required. Prefer least-privilege patterns. If elevation is needed, document the justification and scope.
- medium Privilege Escalation · line 292 Commands invoke sudo or root privileges. Verify this elevated access is necessary and justified.Fix: Avoid sudo/root unless strictly required. Prefer least-privilege patterns. If elevation is needed, document the justification and scope.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 420 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- low Supply Chain · line 289 Remote code is downloaded and executed. This bypasses code review and could introduce malicious code.Fix: Avoid downloading and executing remote scripts. Use trusted packages from PyPI/npm. If remote fetch is required, verify checksums and use HTTPS.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.05845 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.02338 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.01169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00585 |
Grade B, and why
tui-verify-change scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks for rootmediumPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y asciinema ffmpeg tmux Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -fsSL -o /tmp/agg \ The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 422 lines · 96 tokens per session scan B 2a5283cf0724
tui-verify-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository warpdotdev/warp (65,752 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 5,845 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (asks for root, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
speeding-up-laravel-tests
Use when Laravel/Pest test suites are slow, CI duration is growing, individual tests take seconds, or the user asks to speed up, optimize, or profile tests. Covers factories, fakes, config caching, XDebug/pcov, BCRYPTROUNDS, LazilyRefreshDatabase, and stray HTTP requests.
lovable
Lovable MCP tool usage — deploy projects, message agent, test with agent-browser. Minimize credits by delegating to local repo.
agent-browser
Browser automation via Chrome/Chromium CDP — open, snapshot, click, screenshot. For testing web apps, mobile layouts, and automated interactions without Playwright/Puppeteer.
qa-handoff
Generate a hands-on QA testing guide as a self-contained HTML page — for Rails apps or static (Hugo) sites. --publish uploads the HTML to the project's configured QA host.
walkthrough
Generate a hands-on browser walkthrough of a PR's user-facing changes to exercise before review; --publish posts the final version to the PR for QA.
tui-test
Control, inspect, test, and record real terminal apps with the tui-test CLI or its Rust, Python, and JavaScript APIs. Use for shells, TUI apps, text and style locators, keyboard or mouse input, terminal state, clipboard waits, screenshots, recordings, snapshots, and live terminal sessions.