Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/warpirate/linkedin-maxxing/audit-profilenpx skills add warpirate/linkedin-maxxing --skill audit-profilegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/warpirate/linkedin-maxxingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpirate/linkedin-maxxing/audit-profile)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpirate/linkedin-maxxing/audit-profile"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warpirate/linkedin-maxxing/audit-profile.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.02151 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01076 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00430 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
audit-profile scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 174 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A 65353223916f
audit-profile is a skill published in the GitHub repository warpirate/linkedin-maxxing (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 2,151 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
shuorenhua
检查和清理中英文文本里的 AI 套路，适用于“去 AI 味”“说人话”“自然一点”“别像模板”“先标问题”这类改写和审稿需求；按场景控制力度，同时保留事实、术语、语域和责任主体。.
psy-exp-reviewer
Audit psychological experiment ideas, configs, implementation plans, or code without modifying them. Use for code review, design review, readiness for data collection, timing/RT correctness, condition balance, data integrity, PsychoPy/jsPsych/Psychtoolbox anti-patterns, smoke-test guidance, or “实验代码 有没有问题/能不能正式采集”.…
psy-exp-coder
Generate, modify, or debug runnable psychological experiment code when a completed experiment config YAML or concrete existing code is available. Use for PsychoPy/Python, jsPsych/JavaScript, or Psychtoolbox/MATLAB timing, stimuli, condition files, trial loops, data saving, hardware integration, CJK text, runtime…
psy-ana-reviewer
Audit a behavioral-data analysis plan or R/Python script without modifying it. Use for statistical-method review, reproducibility review, publication readiness, seeds, exclusion logging, effect sizes, multiple-comparison correction, assumptions, sensitivity analyses, figures, session information, and…
anti-ai-writing
Use when writing or editing any prose for a human reader - documentation, READMEs, emails, reports, captions, scripts, blog posts, UI copy, commit messages, PR descriptions - or when asked to remove AI tells, de-slop text, make writing sound human, or check writing style. Applies 29 researched patterns that make text…
humanize-pro
Use when the user asks to humanize, unslop, de-slop, de-AI, clean up, tighten, or make text sound human or natural; when they say something reads like AI or like ChatGPT; when they ask whether something matches their voice or style guide; or when drafting or rewriting outbound human communication: LinkedIn, X, cold or…