Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add soupandpsy/amazing-psycoder-skills --skill psy-ana-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/soupandpsy/amazing-psycoder-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/soupandpsy/amazing-psycoder-skills/psy-ana-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soupandpsy/amazing-psycoder-skills/psy-ana-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soupandpsy/amazing-psycoder-skills/psy-ana-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soupandpsy/amazing-psycoder-skills/psy-ana-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soupandpsy/amazing-psycoder-skills/psy-ana-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.04041 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.02021 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00808 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00404 |
Grade A, and why
psy-ana-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 283 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Analysis Code Reviewer
Version
v1.4.0 — unified evidence-gated contract, 2026-07-23. Sub-skill of amazing-psycoder.
Purpose
Audit analysis plans, scripts, execution evidence, and generated results for statistical correctness, reproducibility, and reporting completeness. Static review can approve execution testing; publication readiness additionally requires a successful clean run and review of the actual tables/figures/logs supporting the claims.
This is the analysis audit layer. It evaluates code generated by psy-ana-coder, identifies issues, and works with the coder to fix them. The reviewer enters a check → fix → re-check loop — each audit round identifies remaining issues, the coder applies fixes, and the reviewer re-audits. Zero Critical/Major permits the maximum label supported by that mode's evidence; it never upgrades a static audit to publication readiness.
Review Modes
| Mode | Input | Maximum Label |
|---|---|---|
analysis-audit |
Complete analysis script + config/data schema | ready_for_execution |
result-audit |
Script + config + execution log + generated results | ready_for_publication |
plan-review |
Analysis config YAML | analysis_plan_ready |
triage-only |
Research question | None (missing-info list only) |
blocked |
Insufficient input | None |
Readiness Labels
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
ready_for_publication |
Zero Critical/Major + successful clean execution + reviewed outputs/environment evidence |
ready_for_execution |
Static audit passed; successful clean execution and result review remain |
not_ready |
Critical or Major issues exist |
analysis_plan_ready |
Analysis design complete, ready for code generation |
blocked |
Input insufficient for any review |
Severity Classification
| Severity | Definition |
|---|---|
| Critical | The selected method/implementation cannot estimate the claimed quantity, reverses/mislabels results, or makes the reported results unrecoverable |
| Major | Materially biases estimates/uncertainty, ignores dependence/missingness central to the design, or blocks independent execution/result verification |
| Minor | Does not affect correctness; fix when convenient |
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 283 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A 64a3d7445343
psy-ana-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository soupandpsy/amazing-psycoder-skills (33 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 4,041 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
lm-evaluation-harness
Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
discriminating-proof
Turn a plausible hypothesis into an earned verdict with the cheapest experiment that can kill it — binary oracle with a canary value, a negative control inside the same run, prediction stated before execution, novelty gate before writing, and every link in the evidence chain labelled by epistemic level. Use whenever a…
qector-core
Core domain knowledge and verified facts for the QECTOR quantum error correction platform (plugin v1.0.6, decoder wheel 1.0.0). Covers the app-free library MCP server (8 stable tools), the opt-in research server (29 provisional tools including the evidence layer), the privileged admin server (3 tools), 11 slash…
qector-math-foundations
The strict mathematical ground rules for every QECTOR claim. Encodes the F2 notation, the 16 correctness theorems, the Wilson 95% score interval for LER, the required-artifact- metadata contract, safe-wording rules, and the published limitations that must travel with every claim (reference manual v1.0.0, DOI…
qector-bp-osd
Belief propagation with ordered-statistics post-processing (BP-OSD) for QECTOR. Covers the box-plus kernel phi(x) = -ln(tanh(x/2)), the log-domain sum-product / min-sum / relay schedules, the OSD-0 / OSD-W solve (Theorem 11), the ambiguity-cluster partition (Theorem 12), and the worked examples from the v1.0.0…