Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add graniet/kheish --skill lm-evaluation-harnessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/graniet/kheishWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/graniet/kheish/lm-evaluation-harness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/graniet/kheish/lm-evaluation-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/graniet/kheish/lm-evaluation-harness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/graniet/kheish/lm-evaluation-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/graniet/kheish/lm-evaluation-harness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.03625 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01813 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00725 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00363 |
Grade A, and why
lm-evaluation-harness scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
os.system(f"./eval_checkpoint.sh checkpoints step-{step}") This is a copy
78% identical to evaluating-llms-harness — 61 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 518 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Kheish Compatibility
This skill is repo-local and stays inactive until explicitly activated.
When the original instructions refer to legacy tool names, use these Kheish mappings:
terminal=>bashweb_extract=>web_fetch, plusweb_searchwhen discovery is neededsearch_files=>grep_searchandglob_searchbrowser_*tools require a browser-capable surfaced tool or MCP; if none is available, use the closest available surface and say so explicitly
When the instructions mention local helper files, resolve them from ${KHEISH_SKILL_DIR}.
lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking
Quick start
lm-evaluation-harness evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks using standardized prompts and metrics.
Installation:
pip install lm-eval
Evaluate any HuggingFace model:
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag \
--device cuda:0 \
--batch_size 8
View available tasks:
lm_eval --tasks list
Common workflows
Workflow 1: Standard benchmark evaluation
Evaluate model on core benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval).
Copy this checklist:
Benchmark Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
- [ ] Step 2: Configure model
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze results
Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
Core reasoning benchmarks:
- MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) - 57 subjects, multiple choice
- GSM8K - Grade school math word problems
- HellaSwag - Common sense reasoning
- TruthfulQA - Truthfulness and factuality
- ARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge) - Science questions
Code benchmarks:
- HumanEval - Python code generation (164 problems)
- MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) - Python coding
Standard suite (recommended for model releases):
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge
Step 2: Configure model
HuggingFace model:
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,dtype=bfloat16 \
--tasks mmlu \
--device cuda:0 \
--batch_size auto # Auto-detect optimal batch size
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 518 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 17b547f343cc
lm-evaluation-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository graniet/kheish (227 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 3,625 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 78% identical to evaluating-llms-harness, differing in 61 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
test-reporting
Run the Level 2 dummy agent integration test suite and produce a detailed HTML report with per-test input → outcome analysis.
verify
Verify a code change does what it should by running the app.
ha-test-strategy
Hope-native test strategy for features, fixes, and refactors: select test-first, regression-first, characterization, integration, E2E, or manual evidence according to risk and repository rules.
ha-verify
Hope-native completion and verification discipline: map each requirement to current direct evidence, choose the smallest sufficient checks, and distinguish proven, failed, blocked, stale, or unverified claims.
implement
Implement a technical design by decomposing it into dependency-ordered vertical slices, executing each with TDD red-green, reviewing each via an isolated sub-agent, and persisting progress to a state file so work survives session restarts. Use when the user has a tech design (doc or settled conversation) and says…