Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/warroom-ceo/core/competitive-briefnpx skills add WARROOM-CEO/CORE --skill competitive-briefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WARROOM-CEO/COREWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/warroom-ceo/core/competitive-brief)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warroom-ceo/core/competitive-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warroom-ceo/core/competitive-brief.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02908 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01454 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00582 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00291 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-brief-th scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to competitive-brief — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 334 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Language: All user-facing output — responses, summaries, and any text the user will read — must be written in Thai (ภาษาไทย). Internal logic, file paths, code snippets, and technical values remain in English.
Competitive Brief
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Research competitors and generate a structured competitive analysis comparing positioning, messaging, content strategy, and market presence.
Trigger
User runs /competitive-brief or asks for a competitive analysis, competitor research, or market-th comparison.
Inputs
Gather the following from the user:
-
Competitor name(s) — one or more competitors to analyze (required)
-
Your company/product context (optional but recommended):
- What you sell and to whom
- Your positioning or value proposition
- Key differentiators you want to highlight
-
Focus areas (optional — if not specified, cover all):
- Messaging and positioning
- Product and feature comparison
- Content and thought leadership strategy
- Recent announcements and news
- Pricing and packaging (if publicly available)
- Market presence and audience
Research Process
For each competitor, research using web search:
- Company website — homepage messaging, product pages, about page, pricing page
- Recent news — press releases, funding announcements, product launches, partnerships (last 6 months)
- Content strategy — blog topics, resource types, social media presence, webinars, podcasts
- Review sites and comparisons — third-party comparisons, analyst mentions, customer review themes
- Job postings — hiring signals that indicate strategic direction (optional)
Research Sources
Gather intelligence from these categories of sources:
Primary Sources (Direct from Competitor)
- Website: homepage, product pages, pricing, about page, careers
- Blog and resource center: content themes, publishing frequency, depth
- Social media profiles: messaging, engagement, content strategy
- Product demos and free trials: UX, features, onboarding experience
- Webinars and events: topics, speakers, audience engagement
- Press releases and newsroom: announcements, partnerships, milestones
- Job postings: hiring signals that reveal strategic priorities (e.g., hiring for a new product line or market)
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 334 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 020766aad67f
competitive-brief-th is a skill published in the GitHub repository WARROOM-CEO/CORE (30 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,908 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to competitive-brief, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…