Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add webiny/webiny-js --skill form-modelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/webiny/webiny-jsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/webiny/webiny-js/form-model)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/webiny/webiny-js/form-model"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/webiny/webiny-js/form-model/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/webiny/webiny-js/form-model"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/webiny/webiny-js/form-model.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Tool Misuse · line 741 Tool defaults are unsafe or overly permissive (e.g. disabled TLS verification, no authentication, world-writable permissions). Unsafe defaults widen the attack surface.Fix: Override unsafe defaults with secure settings (verify=True, auth required, restrictive permissions). Review and harden all tool configurations.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.05943 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.02377 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.01189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00594 |
Grade A, and why
webiny-form-model scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 773 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A e472efa4dfd0
webiny-form-model is a skill published in the GitHub repository webiny/webiny-js (8,046 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 5,943 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
payload
Use when working with Payload projects (payload.config.ts, collections, fields, hooks, access control, Payload API). Use when debugging validation errors, security issues, relationship queries, transactions, or hook behavior.
walkeros-create-destination
Use when creating a new walkerOS destination to send events to a vendor or API (GA4/gtag, Meta/Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel, Amplitude, a custom HTTP API, Measurement Protocol), web or server-side. Example-driven workflow: research the vendor SDK and define step examples before implementing the destination interface, env…
walkeros-create-source
Use when creating a new walkerOS source to capture events (browser source, dataLayer interception, server/HTTP source, webhook receiver, event capture), web or server-side. Example-driven workflow: research the input format and define step examples before implementing the push interface, createTrigger, and env pattern.
django-migrations
Django migration patterns and safety workflow for PostHog. Use when creating, adjusting, or reviewing Django/Postgres migrations, including non-blocking index/constraint changes, multi-phase schema changes, data backfills, migration conflict rebasing, and product model moves that require SeparateDatabaseAndState. Also…
implementing-mcp-tools
Guide for exposing PostHog product endpoints as MCP tools. Use when creating new or updating API endpoints, adding MCP tool definitions, scaffolding YAML configs, or writing serializers with good descriptions. Covers the full pipeline from Django serializer to generated TypeScript tool handler.
nestjs-expert
Expert knowledge in NestJS framework, modular architecture, dependency injection, TypeORM/Prisma persistence, microservices transports, and enterprise-grade Node.js backend development. Use when the user mentions NestJS, Nest CLI, decorators, dependency injection, guards, interceptors, or backend microservices, or…