Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wentorai/research-plugins --skill questionnaire-design-guidegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wentorai/research-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wentorai/research-plugins/questionnaire-design-guide)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wentorai/research-plugins/questionnaire-design-guide"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wentorai/research-plugins/questionnaire-design-guide.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.02169 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01085 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00434 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00217 |
Grade A, and why
questionnaire-design-guide scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 235 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Questionnaire Design Guide
Design valid and reliable survey instruments with proper question types, Likert scale construction, response coding, and data preparation for analysis.
Survey Design Principles
Question Types
| Type | Example | Best For | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likert scale | "Rate your agreement: 1-5" | Attitudes, perceptions | Ordinal/interval statistics |
| Multiple choice | "Select your field" | Demographics, categories | Frequencies, chi-square |
| Ranking | "Rank these 5 options" | Preferences, priorities | Rank correlations |
| Open-ended | "Describe your experience" | Exploratory, rich data | Qualitative coding |
| Matrix/grid | Multiple items, same scale | Efficient battery of items | Factor analysis, reliability |
| Slider/VAS | 0-100 visual analog scale | Continuous measures | Parametric statistics |
| Semantic differential | "Easy __ __ __ __ __ Difficult" | Bipolar attitudes | Factor analysis |
The Four C's of Good Questions
- Clear: Avoid jargon, double-barreled questions, and ambiguity
- Concise: Keep questions short (ideally under 20 words)
- Complete: Include all relevant response options
- Consistent: Use the same scale direction and format throughout
Likert Scale Design
Scale Points
| Points | Scale Example | Recommended Use |
|---|---|---|
| 4-point | Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | Forces choice (no neutral), less discriminating |
| 5-point | SD, D, Neutral, A, SA | Most common, good balance of simplicity and discrimination |
| 7-point | SD, D, Somewhat D, Neutral, Somewhat A, A, SA | More discriminating, better for experienced respondents |
| 11-point (0-10) | Not at all to Completely | NPS, continuous-like measures |
Anchoring Labels
5-Point Agreement Scale:
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree
5-Point Frequency Scale:
1 = Never
2 = Rarely
3 = Sometimes
4 = Often
5 = Always
5-Point Satisfaction Scale:
1 = Very Dissatisfied
2 = Dissatisfied
3 = Neutral
4 = Satisfied
5 = Very Satisfied
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 235 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 74ca8baa9a68
questionnaire-design-guide is a skill published in the GitHub repository wentorai/research-plugins (288 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 2,169 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
matlab
Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
phylogenetics
Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
mapping-to-snomed
Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…