Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to wghglory/ngx-lift-workspace. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wghglory/ngx-lift-workspace/main/.cursor/skills/pr-address-comments/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wghglory/ngx-lift-workspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wghglory/ngx-lift-workspace/pr-address-comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wghglory/ngx-lift-workspace/pr-address-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wghglory/ngx-lift-workspace/pr-address-comments/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wghglory/ngx-lift-workspace/pr-address-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wghglory/ngx-lift-workspace/pr-address-comments.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00305 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00122 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
pr-address-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Address Review Comments
Takes review findings or PR comments, presents actionable options, applies approved fixes, and validates with test and lint passes.
Steps
1 — Analyze Findings
Map each finding to the exact file and line number. Verify the current file content to ensure line references are up-to-date.
2 — Formulate Options & Ask
For each major finding:
- Propose 2-3 distinct approaches (e.g. Option A, Option B).
- Mark one as [Recommended] explaining why it best fits the architecture.
- Offer an "Ignore / Skip" option.
- Use
AskQuestionwhen multiple distinct paths exist.
3 — Apply Fixes
- Apply changes using editing tools (
StrReplace,Write). - Preserve surrounding conventions and indentation.
4 — Verify Locally
Run validation commands:
npx nx test [affected-project]
npx nx lint [affected-project]
5 — Local Commit
Create a clean, descriptive local commit (e.g. fix: address review findings for ...). Do not push automatically.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago First seen · 48 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A b8526c1b7d11
pr-address-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository wghglory/ngx-lift-workspace (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 305 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other skills, from other repositories
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
plugin-review
Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.