Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wgpsec/AboutSecurity --skill binary-exploitation-methodologygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wgpsec/AboutSecurityWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wgpsec/aboutsecurity/binary-exploitation-methodology)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wgpsec/aboutsecurity/binary-exploitation-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wgpsec/aboutsecurity/binary-exploitation-methodology.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high YARA Match · line 221 YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00125 | $0.03649 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.01825 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00730 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00365 |
Grade A, and why
binary-exploitation-methodology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 334 lines · 125 tokens per session scan A 034aa6c1b51f
binary-exploitation-methodology is a skill published in the GitHub repository wgpsec/AboutSecurity (1,721 stars, last pushed 8d ago), with no licence file. It adds 125 tokens to every session and 3,649 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
redteam-reverse-detail-pack
Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized reverse engineering analysis, including decompilation, debugging, protocol reversing, firmware extraction, and deobfuscation. Use when a task belongs to the reverse engineering domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.
Reverse Engineering & Binary Analysis
Binary analysis, assembly interpretation, disassembly, decompilation, firmware RE, and protocol reverse engineering.
cpp
Comprehensive C/C++ programming reference covering everything from C11-C23 and C++11-C++23, system programming, CUDA GPU computing, debugging tools, Rust interop, and advanced topics. Use for: C/C++ questions, C/C++ interview preparation, modern language features, RAII/memory management, templates/generics, CUDA…
re-console
A guide to analyzing software from game consoles and older gaming systems. It explains formats such as Switch program containers, PlayStation executables, Xbox files, and ROMs, which are files containing game code and data.
re-deobfuscate
A guide for undoing code obfuscation, which deliberately makes program logic harder to read through misleading instructions, flattened control flow, or encrypted strings.
re-electron
A guide to examining Electron desktop applications, which package web-based JavaScript inside a desktop program. It covers application archives, main and renderer processes, compiled V8 JavaScript, and debugging connections.