Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add whawkinsiv/solo-founder-skills --skill drygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/whawkinsiv/solo-founder-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/whawkinsiv/solo-founder-skills/dry)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whawkinsiv/solo-founder-skills/dry"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whawkinsiv/solo-founder-skills/dry/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whawkinsiv/solo-founder-skills/dry"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whawkinsiv/solo-founder-skills/dry.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.02283 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00035 | $0.01141 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00457 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
dry scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 230 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Don't Repeat Yourself
Find and eliminate duplication across your codebase. Every duplicate is a future bug — when you fix something in one place but forget the copy, users hit the unfixed version.
This skill audits and refactors. For building features, use build. For general performance optimization, use optimize. For database schema design from scratch, use database. For UI component selection, use ui-patterns.
Two Modes
| Mode | When | Scope | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick scan | After building a feature, or on request | Recent changes vs. existing codebase | 2-5 minutes |
| Deep audit | Codebase feels bloated, periodic cleanup | Entire codebase, all three domains | 15-30 minutes |
Choose quick scan after implementing features, adding new pages, or building new API endpoints. Choose deep audit when the codebase has grown through many rounds of AI-assisted iteration, or quarterly as hygiene.
Quick Scan Workflow
Run this after building or modifying a feature.
Quick DRY scan:
- [ ] Identify what was just built or changed
- [ ] Search for similar patterns in existing codebase
- [ ] Flag any duplication with specific file locations
- [ ] Refactor: extract shared code, reuse existing components
- [ ] Verify nothing broke after refactoring
Process
- Identify the change — What files were just created or modified?
- Search for siblings — For each new component, function, or query: does something similar already exist?
- Decide: reuse or extract — If a near-duplicate exists, reuse it. If two things are now similar, extract a shared version.
- Refactor — Make the change, run build and tests.
What to Search For
- New component created → search for components with similar props, layout, or purpose
- New utility function → search for functions with similar signatures or logic
- New API endpoint → search for endpoints with similar query patterns or response shapes
- New database query → search for queries hitting the same tables with similar conditions
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 230 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A c05a5300ec36
dry is a skill published in the GitHub repository whawkinsiv/solo-founder-skills (243 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 2,283 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…