Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/main/.claude/skills/refactor/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00226 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00113 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Refactor Skill
동작 변경 없이 기존 코드의 품질을 개선하기 위해 리팩터링합니다.
원칙
- 동작 변경 없이 구조 개선
- 단일 책임 원칙(SRP)
- 중복 코드 제거(DRY)
- 검증 가능한 작은 증분 단계
프로세스
1. 분석
- 대상 코드 및 관련 테스트 파악
- 모든 호출자 및 의존성 매핑
- 테스트 커버리지 확인 (테스트가 없으면 먼저 추가 제안)
2. 계획
리팩터링 계획을 사용자에게 제시하십시오:
- 변경될 내용
- 변경되지 않을 내용 (동작 보존)
- 위험도 평가 (낮음/중간/높음)
3. 실행
- 작은 검증 가능한 단계로 변경 수행
- 가능한 경우 각 단계 후 테스트 실행
- 원자적 커밋 유지
4. 검증
- 모든 기존 테스트 통과 확인
- 동작 변경 없음 확인
- 리팩터링이 목표 달성 확인
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 33 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 59158c8c7c91
refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 226 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…