Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add willackerly/rebar --skill rebar-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/willackerly/rebarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/willackerly/rebar/rebar-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/willackerly/rebar/rebar-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/willackerly/rebar/rebar-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/willackerly/rebar/rebar-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/willackerly/rebar/rebar-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00471 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00188 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
rebar-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
rebar-audit — run and READ the status surfaces
Steps
rebar audit— REBAR CLI compliance audit; sectioned score out of 10 (rebar itself expects 9–10/10).scripts/ci-check.sh— the full enforcement-script suite; the exit code is the verdict, the output names each failing check.scripts/steward.sh --summary— one-liner: contract counts by computed lifecycle, open discoveries, enforcement passing. A fullscripts/steward.shrun writesSTEWARD_REPORT.md+architecture/.state/steward-report.json.
The two vocabularies (do not conflate)
Computed lifecycle (draft/active/testing/impl-present) is derived by
the steward from file presence, while declared maturity
(stub/draft/in-progress/active/verified) is an honest human/agent
declaration of how real the artifact is. Canonical definitions:
rebar:convention (§Lifecycle Status Definitions, §Declared Maturity) —
resolve with scripts/rebar-doc.sh rebar:convention --cat (or rebar doc
if the CLI is installed).
- Computed shows up in steward output: the
--summarycounts, theSTEWARD_REPORT.mdtable, the.stateJSON.impl-presentmeans implementation files exist — it does NOT mean proven. - Declared shows up as
Status:lines in artifact headers (architecture/CONTRACT-*.md) and is weighted into the compliance badge byscripts/check-compliance.sh. Only this vocabulary may sayverified(active + passing tests/scenarios proving it).
Report what the surfaces actually printed, not what you expected.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 11096cb98a26
rebar-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository willackerly/rebar (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 471 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
rebar-audit compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rebar-auditwillackerly/rebar | Skill | 5 | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 60 | Claude Code |
| adk-reviewgoogle/adk-python | Skill | 22k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 164 | Claude Code, Codex |
| code-review-skillgoogle/adk-python | Skill | 22k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code, Codex |
| review-specific-prcaipe-io/ai-platform-engineering | Skill | 437 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 55 | Claude Code, Codex |
| review-open-pull-requestscaipe-io/ai-platform-engineering | Skill | 437 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 52 | Claude Code, Codex |
| coordinate-reviewhogancv/coordinate-agents | Skill | 106 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code, Codex |
| review-documentationmrinalwadhwa/fluent | Skill | 124 | 5d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 38 | Claude Code |