Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add william-london/ownframework-loop --skill of-loop-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/william-london/ownframework-loopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/william-london/ownframework-loop/of-loop-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/william-london/ownframework-loop/of-loop-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/william-london/ownframework-loop/of-loop-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/william-london/ownframework-loop/of-loop-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/william-london/ownframework-loop/of-loop-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00495 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- review — 94% identical, 3 lines differ
What it actually says
/of-loop:review - one bounded review pass
The parent is a thin coordinator. It does not engineer source and does not own branch/worktree/state identity.
Fast paths (single source of truth)
| State | Action |
|---|---|
| APPROVED / BLOCKED / STOPPED | STOP |
| AWAITING_APPROVAL / READY_TO_START | WAIT - builder owns first start |
| READY_TO_BUILD / BUILDING / CHANGES_REQUESTED | WAIT - no reviewable receipt yet |
| READY_FOR_REVIEW / replayed REVIEWING | REVIEW - proceed |
Pre-start semantics
For an unstarted run with state AWAITING_APPROVAL / READY_TO_START:
- Reviewer WAITS. The builder owns first execution start.
- Reviewer does NOT create the execution seal independently.
- Reviewer does NOT call ofloop build claim.
- Reviewer does NOT issue approval or token.
After the builder creates a build receipt and transitions state to READY_FOR_REVIEW or CHANGES_REQUESTED, the reviewer proceeds with normal exact-SHA review.
Pass responsibilities
- Re-prove current packet bytes and execution binding.
- Claim via ofloop review claim --actor reviewer. A replayed REVIEWING claim is the same pass and MUST NOT increment budget.
- Run ofloop review prepare .
- Optionally materialize reviewer scratch via ofloop review assessment-skeleton.
- Run ofloop review finalize .
- Emit ofloop review marker .
Prohibitions
No raw worktree creation or removal; no direct state/receipt/verdict writes; no scope/budget widening; no push, merge, deploy, publish, remote creation, or external effect.
Scheduling
Canonical unattended scheduling is ofloop supervisor enqueue <repo> <run-id>.
This skill represents one pass and may be invoked through a host adapter for
foreground/debug work. It is not the durable execution clock.
The operator supplies no cadence, claim, preparation, assessment-skeleton, finalizer, or approval commands.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 58 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A cd34dbaaeee5
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository william-london/ownframework-loop (0 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 495 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
mine-plan-review
Strictly review one implemented repository plan against AGENTS.md, architecture, the immutable plan, implementation commits, real runtime behavior, verification evidence, and downstream contracts. Use when the user invokes the host-specific mine-plan-review skill with a plan path, asks whether a plan can be accepted…
review
A code-review skill that compares implemented code with its specification and plan, then writes a structured report of missing work, bugs, and risks.
review
Review all uncommitted changes against project standards before committing.
review-pr
Review a pull request for quality, security, and correctness.
k-review
An independent review of frozen Git base and head versions, checking both the written specification and project standards.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.