Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add windmill-labs/windmill --skill cli-commandsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/windmill-labs/windmill/cli-commands)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/windmill-labs/windmill/cli-commands"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/windmill-labs/windmill/cli-commands/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/windmill-labs/windmill/cli-commands"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/windmill-labs/windmill/cli-commands.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 263 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 206 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 218 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 728 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 799 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 298 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.13743 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.05497 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.02749 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.01374 |
Grade A, and why
cli-commands scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +2 lines 6fb7f4f00a64
- 3d ago Changed · +11 lines 33389851f4f8
- 5d ago Changed 02bc8e03123a
- 9d ago Changed · +2 lines 8cf0eef6b458
- 10d ago Changed ee0b67abedd2
- 15d ago Changed · +9 lines 7a1b453b376b
- 16d ago Changed · +3 lines c3df00f930d6
- 18d ago Changed c0685a0b803a
- 1mo ago Changed · +21 lines 1e0da121e0f6
- 1mo ago First seen · 834 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 688bb4586195
cli-commands is a skill published in the GitHub repository windmill-labs/windmill (18,217 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 13,743 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
resolving-ingestion-warnings
Diagnoses and resolves PostHog ingestion warnings — problems recorded while ingesting events (dropped events, rejected person merges, oversized payloads, invalid data). Use when a user asks why events are missing, dropped, or undercounted, why identify/alias calls don't work or accounts stay duplicated, why person or…
monitoring-ingestion-pipeline
Guide for using the Grafana MCP to monitor and diagnose the Node.js ingestion pipeline workers in production. Use when investigating event lag, drops, pipeline errors, person/group processing, Kafka consumer health, Redis, Postgres, ClickHouse downstream health, or any ingestion worker question. Covers prod-us and…
triaging-merge-queue-failures
Decision procedure for a PR that failed or was removed from the Trunk merge queue: classify the kick (superseded by a newer commit, not mergeable, a gate that failed on a cancelled run, real failure, one-off flake, or repo-wide flaky/infra issue) and take the matching action (wait, hold and fix, requeue once, or…
debugging-ci-failures
Debugs failing GitHub Actions CI runs for PostHog PRs, commits, and branches, and answers broad CI-health questions ("is CI red?", "is master green today?", "what's broken right now?"). Use when the user asks why CI is red, asks for the current CI or master status, or mentions a failing check, GitHub Actions run…
fixing-flaky-tests
Guides an agent through reproducing, root-causing, fixing, and validating flaky tests in the PostHog monorepo. Use when a test fails intermittently in CI but passes on rerun or locally, when hogli ci:insights or the debugging-ci-failures skill classifies a failure as a flaky test, when given a GitHub Actions URL for a…
debugging-experiments
Debug and support PostHog Experiments (A/B tests) for a customer looking at their own results. Use whenever an experiment support ticket is pasted or a customer asks a results question, most commonly "why aren't my exposures even?", "why is one variant getting no traffic?", "why am I missing / seeing too few…