Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/evaluatenpx skills add WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI --skill evaluategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/evaluate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/evaluate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/evaluate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.01582 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00791 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00316 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
evaluate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evaluate
Purpose
Assess a technology, tool, article, or competitive development for relevance to Genesis. Produce a structured evaluation with clear recommendations.
When to Use
- New tool or library surfaces that might replace or augment a Genesis component.
- Competitive product launches or updates (e.g., Cursor Automations, Devin).
- User shares an article or resource for assessment.
- Surplus compute is available and the evaluation queue is non-empty.
Workflow
- Gather context — Read the target material. If a URL, fetch and summarize. If a concept, research current state.
- Map to Genesis — Identify which Genesis components or design decisions the target intersects (routing, memory, perception, surplus, etc.).
- Assess fit — Score along these axes:
- Capability gap: Does this solve something Genesis lacks?
- Replacement risk: Could this obsolete a Genesis component?
- Integration cost: How much work to adopt or adapt?
- Lock-in risk: Does adopting this violate the flexibility principle?
- Rigor gap: Where Genesis has an equivalent, is ours as rigorous? "We have X" is not the same as "our X measures effectiveness, handles edge cases, and improves over time." Compare the QUALITY of our implementation against the reference, not just its existence.
- Overlap Comparison table: When Genesis has a comparable capability, produce the Overlap Comparison table (see Output Format below) instead of prose claims like "we already have this." Required whenever rigor gap is not "N/A — no Genesis equivalent."
- Recommend — One of: ADOPT, WATCH, IGNORE, ADAPT (take the idea, not the tool). Disposition posture: Genesis's scope is everything digital — default toward ADOPT/ADAPT and acting now. "No current use case", "out of our wheelhouse", and "not obviously valuable" are NOT valid grounds for WATCH/IGNORE. A weaker existing Genesis version means UPGRADE (do the rigor-gap / Overlap comparison), never dismiss. WATCH requires a named re-activation trigger; a trigger-less WATCH is a disguised IGNORE — write it as an honest IGNORE with a reason. ADAPT (stealing patterns/rigor without adopting the code) is common and valuable, but it is not a polite default for "I don't want to act" — reach for ADOPT when the thing itself fits.
- Write output — Structured evaluation in the format below.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 153 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 4ca07eb54b83
evaluate is a skill published in the GitHub repository WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI (93 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,582 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
search
Unified academic paper search, citation chains, paper download (arXiv LaTeX/PDF, Sci-Hub), figure extraction from papers, LaTeX source reading, BibTeX fetching, web search, and browser automation for Cloudflare-protected sites (PRL, Science, Nature, Google Scholar).
qec-construct
Verifier-in-the-loop CONSTRUCTION of quantum error-correcting codes with transversal non-Clifford gates (CCZ/T). Applies whenever the project goal is a new or better code/construction — INCLUDING search-phrased goals ("find codes beating X"), where the construct-loop (propose algebraic rule → qverify → debug) is the…
figure
Hybrid figure pipeline (Nano Banana raster + rembg background removal + TikZ vector assembly). Includes a TikZ template library covering quantum circuits (quantikz), Feynman diagrams (tikz-feynman), circuits (circuitikz), molecules (chemfig), 2D/3D plots (pgfplots), energy-level diagrams, phase-space trajectories…
memory
Cross-project research memory. Deep-dive past projects' notes, record corrections, and save cross-project insights across all Luxas research projects.
compute-methods
Environment-verified friction sheets for field-standard computational tools (Rydberg pair interactions, QEC circuits, qLDPC decoding, code distance, atom dynamics, optics, quantum chemistry). Each sheet lists the tools the field actually uses, the first-use frictions that make agents wrongly abandon them, and one-line…
distributed-tracing
Implement distributed tracing with Jaeger and Tempo for request flow visibility across microservices.