Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/muuuun/luxas/compute-methodsnpx skills add Muuuun/luxas --skill compute-methodsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Muuuun/luxasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/muuuun/luxas/compute-methods)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muuuun/luxas/compute-methods"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muuuun/luxas/compute-methods.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00113 | $0.00445 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00222 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
compute-methods scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Compute-methods registry
Why this exists (2026-07-13, debate-adjudicated): experiment agents abandon
the field-standard tool over first-use friction and fall back to
approximations that change the science. Canonical: pairinteraction rejected as
"requires manual database download" when the real fix was the species string
'Yb174_mqdt' — the ν¹¹-scaling fallback missed series splitting and a pair
resonance that refuted a headline claim. A sheet row is cheaper than a
debugging spiral: a friction listed here is a usage bug, not a tool failure.
Sheet contract:
- frontmatter
match:comma-separated keywords (substring, case-insensitive) — ranked by hit count against RESEARCH.md + literature head + task text. - frontmatter
verified:YYYY-MM-DD +verified-on:vm|mac. Sheets withoutverified:are injected with an UNVERIFIED banner; older than 90 days get a STALE banner (frictions demote to hints). - Body: per-tool table (frictions, smoke test), then
## Known false rejections— verbatim wrong claims from past ledgers, so a reviewer can recognize a recurrence. - After you fix a new friction in anger, add the row in the same session — the next agent inherits it.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 36 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A 072969d004fc
compute-methods is a skill published in the GitHub repository Muuuun/luxas (945 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 445 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
proof-checker
Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via cross-model review (external reviewer backend, ultra reasoning), fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明"…
auto-paper-improvement-loop
Autonomously improve a generated paper via GPT-5.6-Sol xhigh review → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says "改论文", "improve paper", "论文润色循环", "auto improve", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.
paper-illustration
Generate publication-quality AI illustrations for academic papers using Gemini image generation. Creates architecture diagrams, method illustrations with Claude-supervised iterative refinement loop. Use when user says "生成图表", "画架构图", "AI绘图", "paper illustration", "generate diagram", or needs visual figures for papers.
experiment-bridge
Workflow 1.5: Bridge between idea discovery and auto review. Reads EXPERIMENTPLAN.md, implements experiment code, deploys to GPU, collects initial results. Use when user says "实现实验", "implement experiments", "bridge", "从计划到跑实验", "deploy the plan", or has an experiment plan ready to execute.
idea-discovery-robot
Workflow 1 adaptation for robotics and embodied AI. Orchestrates robotics-aware literature survey, idea generation, novelty check, and critical review to go from a broad robotics direction to benchmark-grounded, simulation-first ideas. Use when user says "robotics idea discovery", "机器人找idea", "embodied AI idea"…
integrity-forensics
Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → a rules-only reporter that lists every proposal with what the auditor said about it) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate…