vibecode-pro-max-kit is a set of instructions, agents, skills, hooks, and settings that gives AI coding agents a plan-first software development workflow. It is designed for developers, product owners, and other builders using agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, or Copilot across different technology stacks. The catalogue entries are the kit's own workflow components.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/main/.claude/skills/vc-validate-findings/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/vc-validate-findings)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/vc-validate-findings"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/vc-validate-findings.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 260 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 260 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.03092 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01546 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00618 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00309 |
Grade A, and why
vc-validate-findings scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 267 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
vc-validate-findings
Output style: Follow
process/development-protocols/communication-standards.md— answer-first, plain language, no unexplained jargon, TL;DR on long responses.
Defines the role specs, prompts, and output schemas for the two-layer VALIDATE fan-out (a parallel check across 4 dimensions + per-section feasibility probes). Produces a net gate verdict (PASS / CONDITIONAL / BLOCKED) and all the inputs needed to write the validate-contract — the written checklist that gates EXECUTE.
References
references/example-validate-output.md— full V4 menu + validate-contract template; calibrate output format against this file
When To Invoke
- VALIDATE V2–V3: invoked by
vc-validate-agentafter V1 pre-check passes - Post-execute review in UPDATE PROCESS when re-validation of a plan is needed
Strategy Boundary
This skill is STRATEGY-AGNOSTIC. It defines the role specs, prompts, and output schemas for each dimension/section agent. It does NOT determine how those agents are executed (Workflow vs parallel Agent tool vs vc-team).
The execution method is determined by vc-agent-strategy-compare, which must be invoked BEFORE vc-validate-findings is called. vc-validate-findings outputs agent role definitions; the caller executes them using the recommended strategy.
Mode Selection
Choose before spawning any agents. Pass the selected mode to all Layer 1 and Layer 2 agents in their prompt context.
Simple Mode (default)
Runs the Layer 1 + Layer 2 fan-out using context available in the current conversation. Validation agents derive context from the plan file and what was passed in the prompt.
Appropriate when:
- Plan is self-contained (all context needed is in the plan text)
- Context is fresh in the current conversation window
- Blast radius is clear and confined to a single domain
- No container/infra/worker lifecycle surfaces are touched
- Fewer than 5 blast-radius packages
Deep Mode
Trigger when any one of the following is true:
- Plan blast radius touches container, infra, or worker lifecycle
- Plan has 5+ blast-radius packages
- Plan is a phase in a multi-phase program (prior phase outputs must be loaded)
- Caller explicitly requests deep mode
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 267 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 742ac0491010
vc-validate-findings is a skill published in the GitHub repository withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit (1,117 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 3,092 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
new-skill
Scaffold a new custom SKILL.md file interactively. Use when asked to create a new skill or slash command.
gh-issue
Create, view, list, or comment on GitHub issues. Use when asked to file, open, or manage GitHub issues.
gh-pr
Create, review, or manage GitHub pull requests. Use when asked to open, check, or merge a PR.
run-tests
Run the project test suite and surface failures. Use when asked to run tests or check test status.
branch
Create or switch to a feature branch, typically tied to a GitHub issue. Use when asked to create a branch or start work on an issue.
changelog
Generate a changelog or release notes from recent git history. Use when asked to write a changelog, summarize recent commits, or produce release notes.