Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wix/skills --skill rp-project-intakegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wix/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wix/skills/rp-project-intake)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wix/skills/rp-project-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wix/skills/rp-project-intake/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wix/skills/rp-project-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wix/skills/rp-project-intake.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00385 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00192 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
rp-project-intake scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
rp-project-intake
Use when the router reports unresolved project, delivery mode, destination strategy, or source mode.
Resolve project precedence: explicit user project, current project context, the sole project under the migrations root, otherwise ask the user to choose. Never infer from a sibling project.
Resolve delivery mode before destination creation: default to management; choose
website for frontend only; choose management_and_website when the user wants both a
backend migration and a customer-facing storefront. Accept both as an input alias for
management_and_website, then record the canonical value in orchestration/decisions.json.
For delivery modes that include management, also record managementImportMode. Default to
standard; accept an explicit user choice of quick at intake even before the source URL is
probed. The later source-inputs/probe result validates whether a matching quick adapter exists;
never promise quick support merely from the user's choice.
Record faceliftMode=requested only when the user explicitly asks for a post-clone UI/UX
facelift. It is optional, defaults to off, and is not a substitute for normal clone fidelity.
In explicit user-requested 1-click mode include this choice in the initial grouped intake so the later, separate
facelift stage is authorized without another routine approval.
In normal mode ask only the current missing decision. In explicit user-requested 1-click mode
record automationMode=one_click with source=user, collect every still missing intake value
together, record the answers, and continue. Never infer one-click from an uploaded file or
execution surface. Delegate all destination,
source-file, and credential procedures to their dedicated modules.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 35 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 19d74c13d9b1
rp-project-intake is a skill published in the GitHub repository wix/skills (29 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 385 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
story-readiness
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is…
autotask-creator
Rules for automation CRUD from the group-chat commander. The commander does not call mutation tools and does not edit cloud/autotasks files directly. It emits one or more top-level ... containers in its final text; the bus parses and applies them after the turn.
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.