Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins --skill contactsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WYRE-AI/msp-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/contacts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/contacts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/contacts/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/contacts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/contacts.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01247 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00499 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00249 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
Clio Contacts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Clio Contacts
Overview
A contact in Clio is a person or a company. Contacts exist
independently of any single matter — the same contact can be the client on
one matter, opposing counsel on another, and a witness on a third. Tools:
clio_contacts_list, clio_contacts_get, clio_contacts_create,
clio_contacts_update. Navigate into the contacts domain first.
No delete tool exists for contacts — same rule as everywhere else in this integration (see api-patterns). A contact that's no longer relevant doesn't get removed through this integration.
Anti-triggers
- An MSP client, its billing entity, or a service-desk contact — every
other plugin here says "contact", "client", and "company" too, and none
of them mean a party to a legal matter. Use
autotask-crm,connectwise-psa-contacts,halopsa-clients,hubspot-contacts, orqbo-customers. - Everyone connected to a case — a contact is a party record, not the
case file. The relationship (client, opposing party, witness) is carried
on the matter; use
clio-mattersto resolve the matter first. - Removing someone's data on request — no delete tool exists here, and legal retention obligations are exactly why. That request goes to the firm, in Clio, with a human deciding.
People vs. Company Contacts
Clio contacts come in two shapes:
| Type | Examples | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Person | An individual client, an opposing party who is a person, a witness, an individual attorney at another firm | Has first/last name fields |
| Company | A corporate client, an opposing party that's a business entity, a vendor | Has a company/organization name; may have associated people (e.g. a primary contact at the company) |
When creating a contact, get the type right up front — person vs. company determines which fields are meaningful (a company doesn't have a first/last name; a person isn't "incorporated"). If a user describes an entity ambiguously ("Acme" could be a company or could be shorthand for a person at Acme), ask rather than guess, especially before creating a new contact — search first (see below).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A c3de274687ad
Clio Contacts is a skill published in the GitHub repository WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins (49 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,247 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
hr-resume-screener
A resume and cover-letter screening aid based on Korea's National Competency Standards, a framework for describing job skills. It gives human reviewers scores and evidence while masking sensitive personal information.
commerce-influencer-collab
A guide for Korean direct-to-consumer brands planning influencer partnerships, customer-content reposts, and branded merchandise. UGC means content made by customers, such as reviews, photos, or videos.
legal-ip-search-report
A preliminary search and reporting workflow for trademarks and patents using official databases in South Korea, the United States, Japan, and Europe. It records search paths, findings, rights status, risks, and limits; it is not a lawyer's or patent attorney's opinion.
legal-patent-analyzer
A patent analysis tool that turns patent data into technology trends, prior-art reports, freedom-to-operate (FTO) reviews, and draft patent applications. FTO means checking whether a product may infringe existing patent claims.
legal-patent-search
A search tool for Korean patents, utility models, designs, and trademarks using KIPRIS Plus, a public intellectual-property search service. It collects publication details, key patent claims, and classification information.
legal-service-launch-checklist
A pre-launch legal compliance checklist for apps, websites, online stores, and content services. It checks areas such as privacy, consumer sales, advertising, app permissions, subscriptions, and AI-generated content under South Korean rules.