Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins --skill evidence-mappinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WYRE-AI/msp-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/evidence-mapping)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/evidence-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/evidence-mapping/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/evidence-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/evidence-mapping.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.01931 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00966 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00386 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00193 |
Grade A, and why
Evidence Mapping scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evidence Mapping
Overview
Every compliance framework and every cyber-insurance questionnaire ultimately reduces to the same operation: take a control statement in English ("MFA is enforced for all users," "access to PHI systems is logged," "endpoint detection and response is deployed fleet-wide") and produce evidence that either supports or contradicts it. The failure mode this skill exists to prevent is answering from a policy document, a vendor's marketing claim, or a technician's recollection when a live tool query would give a verifiable answer. If a tool can answer it, pull the tool. If no connected tool can answer it, say so explicitly — never fill the gap with an assumption.
Evidence in an MSP's toolchain comes from three vendor families, each proving a different kind of thing:
- CIPP (M365 / Entra ID) proves live tenant configuration — what is actually turned on, enforced, and assigned right now in the identity and productivity plane.
- Liongard proves live infrastructure state — what an automated inspection observed on a server, network device, or cloud resource at last inspection time.
- IT Glue / Hudu proves what is documented — the policy, procedure, or configuration record an engineer wrote down. This may or may not match reality.
Treat these as different evidentiary weights, not interchangeable sources.
Anti-triggers
- ControlMap's own control library and evidence store — ScalePad already
models risks, controls, evidence, policies, and framework objectives per
client; use
scalepad-controlmapwhen working inside that product. This skill maps a control statement onto live queries across whatever happens to be connected. - Reading a single evidence source — pulling standards results,
inspection state, or a document is that connector's surface; use
cipp-standards,liongard-systems, oritglue-documents.
Key Concept: Configured vs. Documented Evidence
This is the single most important judgment call in evidence mapping, and getting it wrong is what turns an evidence package into a liability during an actual audit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 92 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 4b10f1c7ad91
Evidence Mapping is a skill published in the GitHub repository WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins (45 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 1,931 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-contract-review
A tool for reviewing and drafting legal documents such as contracts, terms of service, privacy policies, and service-level agreements (SLAs). An SLA is a contract that defines expected service performance and remedies.
hr-resume-screener
A resume and cover-letter screening aid based on Korea's National Competency Standards, a framework for describing job skills. It gives human reviewers scores and evidence while masking sensitive personal information.
collab-vendor
A supplier-management guide for comparing vendors, organising contracts, and tracking risks in the supply chain. It also covers cross-border purchasing tasks such as customs documents and trade terms.
legal-patent-analyzer
A patent analysis tool that turns patent data into technology trends, prior-art reports, freedom-to-operate (FTO) reviews, and draft patent applications. FTO means checking whether a product may infringe existing patent claims.
legal-service-launch-checklist
A pre-launch legal compliance checklist for apps, websites, online stores, and content services. It checks areas such as privacy, consumer sales, advertising, app permissions, subscriptions, and AI-generated content under South Korean rules.
legal-patent-search
A search tool for Korean patents, utility models, designs, and trademarks using KIPRIS Plus, a public intellectual-property search service. It collects publication details, key patent claims, and classification information.