Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xbsheng/atguigu-note --skill receiving-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xbsheng/atguigu-noteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xbsheng/atguigu-note/receiving-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xbsheng/atguigu-note/receiving-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xbsheng/atguigu-note/receiving-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xbsheng/atguigu-note/receiving-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xbsheng/atguigu-note/receiving-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01913 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00957 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00383 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00191 |
Grade A, and why
receiving-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 214 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A d2abac33cee0
receiving-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository xbsheng/atguigu-note (325 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,913 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
karpathy
Coding principles for simplicity, clarity, and surgical precision. Use when you want Claude to think before coding, keep solutions minimal, make surgical changes, and define verifiable success criteria. Triggers on: karpathy mode, think before coding, simplicity first, surgical changes.
code-reviewer
Reviews Java code for best practices, security issues, and Spring Framework conventions. Use when user asks to review, analyze, or audit code.
remember
Review the current conversation and capture valuable knowledge — best practices, coding conventions, architecture decisions, workflows, and user feedback — into persistent memory (AGENTS.md) or reusable skills. Use when the user says: (1) remember this, (2) save what we learned, (3) update memory, (4) capture…
code-review
Perform a structured code review of changes, checking for correctness, style, tests, and potential issues.
adk-review
Reviews the uncommitted changes in an adk-python working tree and reports correctness, design, public-API stability, test, sample and documentation gaps as a prioritized findings report, fixing them only when asked. Use when the user asks to review local changes, wants a self-review before opening a pull request, asks…
code-review-skill
Reviews code with feedback tailored to the developer's profile in session state.