mastermind-browser-verification

mastermind-browser-verification is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from xcrft/mastermind. It costs 64 tokens per session (797 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A browser-checking workflow that records accessibility-tree details, console and network errors, viewport settings, and colour-scheme checks after a user-interface change.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify buttons, inputs, error messages, empty states, disabled controls, page layouts, and browser-console or network failures across specified viewports and colour schemes.
Why use it?
It replaces the vague claim that a page “looks fine” with evidence that can be read and compared later. It also exposes rendering errors and failed requests as test failures.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/xcrft/mastermind/mastermind-browser-verification
Any agent
npx skills add xcrft/mastermind --skill mastermind-browser-verification
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xcrft/mastermind

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for mastermind-browser-verification

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xcrft/mastermind/mastermind-browser-verification.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xcrft/mastermind/mastermind-browser-verification)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xcrft/mastermind/mastermind-browser-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xcrft/mastermind/mastermind-browser-verification.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 64 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 797 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00064 $0.00797
Opus 5 $0.00032 $0.00398
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00159
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00080

Measured 3d ago against content hash 3ccd0c10b7e5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

mastermind-browser-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/testing/mastermind-browser-verification/SKILL.md · 83 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Mastermind browser verification

An agent that says "I checked it in the browser and it works" has produced no evidence. The claim cannot be re-read, cannot be compared against the next run, and cannot be distinguished from not having looked.

Browser checks are worth running. They just have to leave something behind.

The accessibility tree is the evidence; the screenshot is not

Read the page as an accessibility tree, not as an image. The tree is text: it can be quoted in the report, diffed against the next run, and checked against a criterion like "the disabled control is not focusable" or "the empty state renders". A screenshot proves nothing to anything downstream — it is for a human to look at, and it belongs in the report as an attachment, never as the basis of a claim.

Concretely: assert on roles, names, and states from the tree. "Submit button present, disabled state set, error text Card expired associated with the input" is evidence. "Looks right" is not.

Console and network errors are mechanical failures

Read console messages filtered to errors, and network requests for failed responses. A page that throws during render, or 404s on an asset, has failed — that is not a matter of taste and does not need a screenshot to establish.

Record the count and the messages. A clean console is itself an observation worth recording, because next week's run will want something to compare against.

Viewports and colour scheme are a checklist, not a vibe

Resize deliberately and record each result: mobile, tablet, desktop, and the dark scheme if the product has one. "Responsive" as a bare claim means the agent did not resize. Three recorded observations at three widths mean it did.

If a viewport was not checked, it is not checked — see below.

Record what you checked and what you did not

Every browser observation goes into the report with its scope:

### Browser observations
- `read_page` at 375px — nav collapsed to a menu button; primary CTA present and enabled.
- Console — 0 errors, 0 warnings.
- Network — no failed requests.
- Dark scheme — **not checked** (no dark palette in this change).
- Visual fidelity against the frame — **not checked** (needs human review).

Read the full file on GitHub · 83 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 83 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 3ccd0c10b7e5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

mastermind-browser-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository xcrft/mastermind (11 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 797 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.