Security Audit

Security Audit is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Xiaowen-Jiang/agent-enterprise. It costs 14 tokens per session (537 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code and architecture review based on the OWASP guidelines, which are widely used recommendations for finding web and application security weaknesses.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review APIs, forms, uploads, authentication, permissions, data handling, configuration, dependencies, and logging for security risks.
Why use it?
It gives a structured check for problems such as injection, broken access control, exposed secrets, unsafe input handling, and vulnerable dependencies.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review APIs, forms, uploads, authentication, permissions, data handling, configuration, dependencies, and logging for security risks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/xiaowen-jiang/agent-enterprise/security_audit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Xiaowen-Jiang/agent-enterprise --skill security_audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Xiaowen-Jiang/agent-enterprise

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Security Audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xiaowen-jiang/agent-enterprise/security_audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xiaowen-jiang/agent-enterprise/security_audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xiaowen-jiang/agent-enterprise/security_audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xiaowen-jiang/agent-enterprise/security_audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for Security Audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xiaowen-jiang/agent-enterprise/security_audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xiaowen-jiang/agent-enterprise/security_audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 537 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00014 $0.00537
Opus 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00215
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00107
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00054

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 6ad96b238796, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Security Audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agent_enterprise/skills_data/security_audit/SKILL.md · 66 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Process

  1. Map the attack surface — Identify entry points (APIs, forms, file uploads, auth endpoints)
  2. OWASP Top 10 check:
    • Injection: SQL, NoSQL, OS command, LDAP injection
    • Broken Authentication: Weak passwords, session management, credential exposure
    • Sensitive Data Exposure: Unencrypted data, hardcoded secrets, verbose errors
    • XML/XXE: External entity processing
    • Broken Access Control: Missing authorization checks, IDOR, privilege escalation
    • Security Misconfiguration: Default credentials, unnecessary features, missing headers
    • XSS: Reflected, stored, DOM-based cross-site scripting
    • Insecure Deserialization: Untrusted data deserialization
    • Known Vulnerabilities: Outdated dependencies with CVEs
    • Insufficient Logging: Missing audit trails, no alerting
  3. Check secrets management — Hardcoded keys, tokens in source, .env in git
  4. Review auth/authz — Token validation, session handling, role checks
  5. Check input validation — All user inputs sanitized and validated
  6. Dependency audit — Check for known vulnerabilities in dependencies

Output Format

## Security Audit Report

**Scope**: [Files/components reviewed]
**Risk Level**: Critical / High / Medium / Low

### Findings

#### [CRITICAL] Finding Title
- **Location**: file:line
- **Vulnerability**: [OWASP category]
- **Impact**: [What an attacker could do]
- **Remediation**: [Specific fix with code example]

#### [HIGH] Finding Title
...

### Summary
- Critical: N findings
- High: N findings
- Medium: N findings
- Low: N findings

### Recommendations
1. [Priority-ordered action items]

Guidelines

  • Always check for hardcoded secrets first — they're the most common critical finding
  • Test input validation at every boundary (API params, form fields, file names)
  • Verify that error messages don't leak internal details
  • Check that all endpoints have proper authentication AND authorization
  • Review dependencies for known CVEs
  • Look for debug/development code left in production paths

Read the full file on GitHub · 66 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 6ad96b238796

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Security Audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Xiaowen-Jiang/agent-enterprise (52 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 537 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

code-review

Reviews Spec Kit code changes for consistency with applicable design documents, positive and negative test coverage, regression evidence for bug fixes, and consistent repository terminology. Use when reviewing a diff or pull request. Do not use for implementing changes or posting GitHub review actions.

github/spec-kit · 54 tokens

ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking

Autonomous AI agent benchmark evaluation register: task completion rates, planning accuracy, tool invocation precision, and cost benchmarks.

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills · 31 tokens

ce-code-review

Review a named diff or PR for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use when asked to review code or when a shipping skill needs a review receipt. Use when asked to apply this review's findings locally. Use ce-resolve-pr-feedback for feedback already left on a PR.

EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin · 62 tokens

ce-resolve-pr-feedback

Judge PR feedback centrally, apply valid fixes, and complete review conversations with publication verified. Use when addressing feedback already left on a PR, preparing local fixes for a caller to publish, or completing a saved feedback batch. Use ce-code-review for reviewing code before feedback exists.

EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin · 60 tokens

code-review

Review code for quality, maintainability, and correctness.

PrefectHQ/fastmcp · 10 tokens

sage-review

Deep, platform-neutral code review for PRs and CRs in ONE thorough single pass — design reasoning (Problem Worth Solving & Solution Fit) as one dimension alongside the 9 code-level dimensions, with chain-of-consequences, self-critique, and draft-only comments. The single app-owned source of truth.

kirodotdev/KiroCrew · 68 tokens