Codeg is a collaborative workspace that brings multiple AI coding agents and their sessions into one searchable application. Developers use it to coordinate agents, delegate work, and review unattended coding tasks across desktop, server, Docker, and mobile clients. The catalogue entries are skills and instructions for workflows within Codeg.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xintaofei/codeg --skill finishing-a-development-branchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xintaofei/codegWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xintaofei/codeg/finishing-a-development-branch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xintaofei/codeg/finishing-a-development-branch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xintaofei/codeg/finishing-a-development-branch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xintaofei/codeg/finishing-a-development-branch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xintaofei/codeg/finishing-a-development-branch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.01926 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00770 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00385 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00193 |
Grade A, and why
finishing-a-development-branch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to finishing-a-development-branch — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 226 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
Step 1: Verify Tests
Run the project's full test suite (npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...).
If tests fail, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
If tests pass: continue to Step 2.
Step 2: Detect Environment
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
# Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory
# before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:
| State | Menu | Cleanup |
|---|---|---|
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo) |
Standard 3 options | No worktree to clean up |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branch |
Standard 3 options | Provenance-based (see Step 6) |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEAD |
Reduced 2 options (no merge) | Externally managed — leave in place |
Step 3: Determine Base Branch
The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.
Step 4: Present Options
Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
Which option?
Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 226 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 8db5a922b242
finishing-a-development-branch is a skill published in the GitHub repository xintaofei/codeg (4,001 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,926 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to finishing-a-development-branch, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
managing-archestra-releases
Runs rolling beta releases, stable patches, and complete stable-line cutovers. Use when backporting fixes, cutting or retiring release branches, configuring release protections, testing artifacts, recovering failed runs, or approving releases.
archestra-merge-queue
Use when asked to add an Archestra PR to the merge queue, monitor it through merge, or diagnose and repair merge-group CI failures. Own the requested PR until merged or an actionable blocker; opening a PR alone does not start this workflow.
release
Verify, write the CHANGELOG, cut a version — then hand the release sequence back.
archestra-pr-hygiene
Use when opening or updating an Archestra pull request to write an accurate conventional title and a practical, evidence-based description.
archestra-dev-resource-cleanup
Reclaim unused Archestra development worktrees, local branches, processes, and OrbStack Kubernetes resources while preserving the active Tilt stack and unfinished work.
github-pr
Analyze pull request context and highlight merge risks from diffs and comments.