Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Xipher-Labs/walter-os --skill compliance-prep-toolkitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Xipher-Labs/walter-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xipher-labs/walter-os/compliance-prep-toolkit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xipher-labs/walter-os/compliance-prep-toolkit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xipher-labs/walter-os/compliance-prep-toolkit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xipher-labs/walter-os/compliance-prep-toolkit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xipher-labs/walter-os/compliance-prep-toolkit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01111 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00556 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-prep-toolkit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 108 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A f8853ae0359d
compliance-prep-toolkit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Xipher-Labs/walter-os (6 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,111 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
consent
A consent manager for allowing or withdrawing permission to process learning and behavior data. Consent means a person actively agrees to this data use.
compliance-check
Validate codebase against code-level compliance signals for regulatory frameworks (FedRAMP, FIPS, OWASP, SOC 2). Scoped to source code analysis only — not a compliance certification.
local-legal-seo-audit
Audit and improve local SEO for law firms, attorneys, forensic experts and legal/professional services sites with local presence, focusing on GBP, directories, E-E-A-T and practice/location pages.
EU AI Act High-Risk Obligations
PASS/FAIL/N/A checklist for the high-risk AI obligations under Articles 8-15 of the EU AI Act, plus the quality management system, conformity assessment, registration, post-market monitoring, and incident reporting.
EU AI Act Risk Classification
Decision tree for classifying an AI system into the EU AI Act risk tier (unacceptable/high/limited/minimal) and identifying the actor role (provider/deployer/importer/distributor).
EU AI Act General-Purpose AI
Checklist for the general-purpose AI (GPAI) obligations under Articles 51-55 — technical documentation, copyright policy, training-data summary, and systemic-risk obligations (evaluation, adversarial testing, incident reporting, cybersecurity).