Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit --skill compliance-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/compliance-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/compliance-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/compliance-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/compliance-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/compliance-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high System Prompt Leakage · line 9 Skill contains instructions that could directly expose system prompts, internal rules, or hidden instructions to users or external parties.Fix: Remove any instructions that reveal, print, or output system prompts or internal rules. System instructions should never be exposed to end users.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 4 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.03688 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.01475 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00738 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00369 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-check scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- Command injection (os.system, exec with user input) How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 414 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/compliance-check Workflow
Output Rules
- Always print full absolute paths for all artifact references (plan files, review files, audit logs). This makes paths clickable in terminals like Warp. Use the resolved
$PLANS_DIRvalue, never relative paths.
Role
This skill is a scan coordinator. It orchestrates parallel compliance signal scans per requested framework, synthesizes findings, and produces a structured report with a PASS / PASS_WITH_NOTES / BLOCKED verdict. It checks code-level signals only — it does not verify organizational, infrastructure, or procedural controls.
This report is a development aid, not a compliance certification.
Inputs
- Framework(s): $ARGUMENTS (required)
fedramp— Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program code-level controlsfips— FIPS 140-3 approved cryptography and key management patternsowasp— OWASP Top 10 compliance with evidencesoc2— SOC 2 Type II code-level security controls
Multiple frameworks can be specified: /compliance-check fips owasp
Step 0 — Parse and validate framework arguments
Resolve devkit paths (MUST be first action in Step 0):
Tool: Bash
# --- Devkit Path Resolution ---
DEVKIT_SCRIPTS="${CLAUDE_DEVKIT:-$HOME/.claude-devkit}/scripts"
# Source path resolution helper
if [ -f "$DEVKIT_SCRIPTS/resolve-project-dir.sh" ]; then
. "$DEVKIT_SCRIPTS/resolve-project-dir.sh"
DEVKIT_PROJECT_DIR_RESOLVED=$(resolve_devkit_project_dir) || {
echo "Failed to resolve project directory" >&2; exit 1
}
elif [ -n "${DEVKIT_PROJECT_DIR:-}" ]; then
DEVKIT_PROJECT_DIR_RESOLVED="$DEVKIT_PROJECT_DIR"
else
echo "WARNING: devkit is not installed. Using deprecated .devkit/ fallback." >&2
DEVKIT_PROJECT_DIR_RESOLVED=".devkit"
fi
PLANS_DIR="$DEVKIT_PROJECT_DIR_RESOLVED/plans"
mkdir -p "$PLANS_DIR"
echo "Plans directory: $PLANS_DIR"
Tool: Read
Parse $ARGUMENTS as a space-separated list of framework names.
Normalize each to lowercase for matching.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 414 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A fa5a2bdb52d9
compliance-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit (15 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 3,688 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
general-counsel-advisor
General Counsel advisory for startups: contract review (MSA, SaaS, NDA, DPA, employment), IP strategy, term sheet decoding, and regulatory landscape mapping. Use when reviewing any contract or term sheet, deciding when to engage outside counsel, defining IP strategy, evaluating regulatory exposure (HIPAA, GDPR, FDA…
ma-playbook
M&A strategy for acquiring companies or being acquired. Due diligence, valuation, integration, and deal structure. Use when evaluating acquisitions, preparing for acquisition, M&A due diligence, integration planning, or deal negotiation.
agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305
Für AGB Begriff Vorformuliert 305: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305.
blue-pencil-board-agb-bonitaetspruefung-bonus
Für Blue Pencil und Geltungserhaltende Reduktion: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Tatbestands- oder Anspruchsmatrix.
haftungsdeckel-fuer-daten-und-modelldienste-pruefen
Bewertet Haftungshöchstbeträge bei Datenverlust, fehlerhaften Modellausgaben und Ausfällen digitaler Dienste anhand konkreter Schadensszenarien. Liefert eine Entscheidungsvorlage mit Risikobeträgen, Ausnahmen und Freigabebedarf.
klauselinhalt-und-verbote-pruefen
Prüft eine AGB-Klausel anhand von Kontrollfähigkeit, gesetzlichen Klauselverboten und Interessenabwägung. Für B2C und B2B; liefert ein Klauselvotum mit Leitbild, Gegenposition und konkreter Rechtsfolge.