Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills --skill systematic-review-epigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills/systematic-review-epi)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills/systematic-review-epi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills/systematic-review-epi/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills/systematic-review-epi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills/systematic-review-epi.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.05745 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02873 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00575 |
Grade A, and why
systematic-review-epi scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 501 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A c9ced4a6bebe
systematic-review-epi is a skill published in the GitHub repository xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills (34 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 5,745 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
environment-life-review-forge
Adapts evidence synthesis workflows for environmental, ecological, biomedical, and life-science questions. Use for PECO/PICO frameworks, exposure-outcome reviews, ecological heterogeneity, dose-response evidence, risk-of-bias planning, environmental indicators, NDVI or vegetation-index models, partial least squares…
easymeta
A workflow for systematic reviews, evidence maps, and meta-analyses in medicine, public health, and natural or environmental sciences.
meta-analysis-forge
Designs and audits first-order meta-analyses of primary studies. Use for effect-size extraction, effect-size harmonization, fixed/random/multilevel models, robust variance estimation, heterogeneity, prediction intervals, meta-regression, publication-bias diagnostics, sensitivity checks, coding sheets, reproducible…
evidence-synthesis-forge
Orchestrates systematic reviews, scoping reviews, evidence maps, meta-analyses, umbrella reviews, and AI-assisted evidence synthesis. Use when designing protocols, eligibility criteria, search strategies, screening workflows, coding manuals, effect-size plans, synthesis reports, or reproducible evidence-review…
ma-manuscript-quarto
Draft and render a meta-analysis manuscript with Quarto using an IMRaD structure and embedded figures/tables. Use when preparing the final paper from analysis outputs.
ma-end-to-end
End-to-end AI-assisted meta-analysis pipeline orchestration from TOPIC.txt to final manuscript and reviewer responses. Use when the user provides a topic and wants the full meta-analysis workflow, tracking, and final paper.