Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xperiun/claude-code-powerbi-skills --skill pbi-modelo-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xperiun/claude-code-powerbi-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xperiun/claude-code-powerbi-skills/pbi-modelo-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xperiun/claude-code-powerbi-skills/pbi-modelo-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xperiun/claude-code-powerbi-skills/pbi-modelo-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xperiun/claude-code-powerbi-skills/pbi-modelo-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xperiun/claude-code-powerbi-skills/pbi-modelo-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.03473 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01736 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00695 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00347 |
Grade A, and why
pbi-modelo-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 246 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/pbi-modelo-review — Auditoria de modelo Power BI
📦 Distribuída publicamente: github.com/xperiun/claude-code-powerbi-skills — pasta
claude-code/pbi-modelo-review/(skill nativa) +claude-web/pbi-modelo-review.zip(upload no Claude.ai). Mudança aqui exige sincronizar lá: atualizar pasta + regenerar ZIP (Pythonzipfile, ver CLAUDE.md) + commit + bump CHANGELOG. Repo é open-source, leiame público — evitar referências internas (Xperiun-only) na SKILL.md.
Audita um projeto Power BI (formato PBIP) e devolve relatório priorizado com:
- Score geral (0–100)
- Issues agrupados por severidade (crítico / médio / leve)
- Distribuição por categoria (6 famílias de check)
- Cada issue com: o que é, onde está, por que importa, como corrigir (snippet quando aplicável)
Quando usar
- Analista herdou um
.pbixe quer mapa rápido de qualidade - Líder de dados pedindo auditoria antes de escalar/migrar modelo
- Consultor entrando em cliente novo
- Pré-handoff entre times
- Você quer um "linter" rodando antes de subir pra produção
Não usar quando:
- Quer apenas documentação descritiva → use
/pbi-doc - Quer criar uma medida nova → use
/pbi-dax-create - Quer otimização de performance específica de uma query (skill futura
/pbi-perf)
Pré-requisitos
- Projeto em formato PBIP (Power BI Project) — pasta com
.SemanticModel/e.Report/. Se o usuário só tem.pbix, instruir conversão antes de prosseguir:Power BI Desktop → File → Save as → Power BI Project (.pbip)
- Acesso aos arquivos
.tmdl(via filesystem ou upload — ver "Modos de execução" abaixo)
Se faltar PBIP, retornar mensagem curta:
Esse projeto ainda está em
.pbix(binário). Pra eu auditar, salva como Power BI Project:File → Save as → Power BI Project (.pbip). Vira uma pasta de texto e aí eu consigo ler. Avisa quando converter.
E encerrar — não tentar rodar nada.
Modos de execução
A skill detecta automaticamente o ambiente e adapta input/output:
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 246 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 93ad48229b32
pbi-modelo-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository xperiun/claude-code-powerbi-skills (115 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 3,473 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…