Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xxxxxccc/devops-bot --skill code-review-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xxxxxccc/devops-botWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xxxxxccc/devops-bot/code-review-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xxxxxccc/devops-bot/code-review-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xxxxxccc/devops-bot/code-review-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xxxxxccc/devops-bot/code-review-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xxxxxccc/devops-bot/code-review-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00478 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00191 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to code-review-analysis — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Code Review Analysis
Table of Contents
Overview
Systematic code review process covering code quality, security, performance, maintainability, and best practices following industry standards.
When to Use
- Reviewing pull requests and merge requests
- Analyzing code quality before merging
- Identifying security vulnerabilities
- Providing constructive feedback to developers
- Ensuring coding standards compliance
- Mentoring through code review
Quick Start
Minimal working example:
# Check the changes
git diff main...feature-branch
# Review file changes
git diff --stat main...feature-branch
# Check commit history
git log main...feature-branch --oneline
Reference Guides
Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:
| Guide | Contents |
|---|---|
| Initial Assessment | Initial Assessment |
| Code Quality Analysis | Code Quality Analysis |
| Security Review | Security Review |
| Performance Review | Performance Review |
| Testing Review | Testing Review |
| Best Practices | Best Practices |
Best Practices
✅ DO
- Be constructive and respectful
- Explain the "why" behind suggestions
- Provide code examples
- Ask questions if unclear
- Acknowledge good practices
- Focus on important issues
- Consider the context
- Offer to pair program on complex issues
❌ DON'T
- Be overly critical or personal
- Nitpick minor style issues (use automated tools)
- Block on subjective preferences
- Review too many changes at once (>400 lines)
- Forget to check tests
- Ignore security implications
- Rush the review
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 83 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A b50b9b7f06a8
code-review-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository xxxxxccc/devops-bot (47 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 478 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to code-review-analysis, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-backlog-killer
Detect pull requests aging past warn / critical thresholds, score severity, and nudge reviewers via Slack DM, channel, email, or directly as a PR comment — with one-time auto-escalation when a PR hits critical so velocity stops leaking through review queues.
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…