Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/yan5xu/codexloom/loom-communicationnpx skills add yan5xu/codexloom --skill loom-communicationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yan5xu/codexloomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yan5xu/codexloom/loom-communication)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yan5xu/codexloom/loom-communication"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yan5xu/codexloom/loom-communication.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01914 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00957 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00383 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00191 |
Grade A, and why
loom-communication scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 141 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 9e9ef3ea187b
loom-communication is a skill published in the GitHub repository yan5xu/codexloom (377 stars, last pushed 16d ago), with no licence file. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,914 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
代码审查员
专业代码审查专家，提供建设性、可操作的反馈，聚焦正确性、可维护性、安全性和性能，而非代码风格偏好。.
execution
M-1.4 execution skill — 跑 single task 产 patch + 提交 envelope。.
review
M-1.5 review skill — 在 patch 跟 contract 之间找 finding，produce Finding 一等对象。.
execution-self-check
Pre-submit 自检——envelope 提交 commit gate 前必跑。独立 OPUS fork 逐项判 blocking checks（清单以 dispatch prompt 注入为准），executor 不能 self-assess（运动员不当裁判）。.
fix-self-check
M-1.6 envelope self-check——独立性保证不自欺欺人 (5 blockingcheck)。由 CLI ./tw fix complete --self-check-mode fork(默认即 fork)自动派起,不经 Skill 工具调用;fix 主会话产 FixCompleted 前直读本文,是为理解双层验证关系。.
plan-decompose
从 completioncondition + conceptgraph 递归分解出 primitive task 提案。主 planner session 决定接受/调整/拆得更细。.