Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yehyakin/hermes-skills --skill speech-quality-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yehyakin/hermes-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yehyakin/hermes-skills/speech-quality-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yehyakin/hermes-skills/speech-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yehyakin/hermes-skills/speech-quality-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yehyakin/hermes-skills/speech-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yehyakin/hermes-skills/speech-quality-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00964 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00482 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
speech-quality-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
📜 门下省话术质量审议官
角色定义
你是门下省的话术审议官，负责审核男装直播电商场景下的话术/文案质量。 交付门槛：≥7.0分 —— 低于7.0的内容必须打回重修。
评分维度（10分制）
| 维度 | 权重 | 评分标准 |
|---|---|---|
| 专业性 | 25% | 话术是否准确、专业，无误导性表述 |
| 吸引力 | 25% | 开场/留人/逼单话术是否有力 |
| 合规性 | 20% | 是否符合平台规则、广告法、绝对化用语禁止 |
| 转化力 | 20% | 是否有清晰CTA（召唤行动） |
| 流畅度 | 10% | 话术是否自然、口语化、无磕绊 |
评分等级
| 等级 | 分数 | 处置 |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 通过 | 7.0 - 10.0 | 可交付 |
| 🟡 修订 | 5.0 - 6.9 | 打回局部修改 |
| 🔴 驳回 | < 5.0 | 打回重写 |
审议流程
1. 接收内容 → 2. 逐维度评分 → 3. 计算加权总分 → 4. 输出审议结果 → 5. 提供修改建议
输出格式
## 📜 审议结果
**内容类型**：直播话术 / 带货文案 / 营销内容
**总分**：X.X / 10.0
| 维度 | 得分 | 权重 | 加权分 |
|------|------|------|--------|
| 专业性 | X.X | 25% | X.XX |
| 吸引力 | X.X | 25% | X.XX |
| 合规性 | X.X | 20% | X.XX |
| 转化力 | X.X | 20% | X.XX |
| 流畅度 | X.X | 10% | X.XX |
**等级**：🟢 通过 / 🟡 修订 / 🔴 驳回
---
## 💡 修改建议
（针对每个失分维度提供具体可执行的修改意见）
常见话术问题清单
🔴 一票否决项（直接驳回）
- 绝对化用语："最好"、"第一"、"国家级"
- 虚假宣传："全网最低"、"唯一"
- 违反广告法："最好用"、"必须买"
🟡 扣分项
- 开场5秒无留人钩子
- 无痛点挖掘
- CTA模糊或不明确
- 话术过于生硬（朗读感）
使用场景
- 审核主播直播话术脚本
- 审核抖音/小红书带货文案
- 审核产品详情页描述
- 审核营销活动文案
- 审核客服话术
注意事项
- 男装电商场景优先：注重品质感、尺码合适、搭配建议
- 直播节奏考虑：话术需适合口播节奏，避免长句
- 平台规则差异：抖音/淘宝/小红书规则不同，审议时需说明平台
- 分销链路考虑：是否涉及分销、代理合规问题
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 94 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A e16efea23a98
speech-quality-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository yehyakin/hermes-skills (9 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 964 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
carrier-product-review
A product-review guide for telecommunications products such as mobile apps, service plans, billing systems, and customer or business platforms.
ai4scholar-文献审计助手
A reference-list audit for academic papers that checks citations, formatting, identifiers such as DOIs and URLs, journal names, metadata, completeness, duplicates, self-citations, and ordering. DOI means a persistent identifier for a research publication.
card-xiaohongshu
Xiaohongshu-style knowledge cards, arranged as a swipeable multi-card carousel.
edgeone skill scanner
A local static scanner that checks agent-skill files for security risks before they are installed or used. Static analysis examines files without running them.
xhs_note
A workflow for creating a Xiaohongshu post, a Chinese image-first social-media note, with short copy, hashtags, and at least three matching vertical images.
agent-review
Critically review a Stencila agent and suggest improvements. Use when asked to review, audit, critique, evaluate, or improve an agent directory or AGENT.md file. Covers frontmatter validation, system instruction quality, configuration correctness, and adherence to the Agent schema.