Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yinqd3/workbuddy-skills --skill using-superpowersgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yinqd3/workbuddy-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/using-superpowers)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/using-superpowers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/using-superpowers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/using-superpowers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yinqd3/workbuddy-skills/using-superpowers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00709 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00354 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
using-superpowers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Superpowers — WorkBuddy 版
基于 obra/superpowers 适配的软件工程方法论技能集。
核心理念
想法 → 头脑风暴 → 计划 → TDD 执行 → 代码审查 → 完成
不是建议，是强制管线。 "太简单不需要设计" —— 这是最危险的幻觉。
技能管线总览
| 阶段 | 技能 | 触发条件 |
|---|---|---|
| 0. 入口 | using-superpowers |
任何编码任务开始时 |
| 1. 设计 | brainstorming |
新功能/改动需求 → 先设计再动手 |
| 2. 计划 | writing-plans |
设计确认后 → 写详细实现计划 |
| 3. 执行 | executing-plans 或 subagent-driven-development |
按计划逐任务执行 |
| 4. TDD | test-driven-development |
每个实现步骤强制 TDD |
| 5. 调试 | systematic-debugging |
Bug / 测试失败 → 四阶段系统调试 |
| 6. 审查 | requesting-code-review / receiving-code-review |
代码变更后审查 |
| 7. 验证 | verification-before-completion |
完成前强制验证 |
| 8. 收尾 | finishing-a-development-branch |
所有任务完成，测试通过 |
| 9. 并行 | dispatching-parallel-agents |
多子代理并行任务 |
| 10. 元技能 | writing-skills |
编写/改进 Skill 本身 |
四条铁律
- 先设计再动手 → 没有例外，再简单的项目也要先过 brainstorming
- TDD 不可跳过 → 没有失败的测试，就没有生产代码
- 先根因再修复 → 没有根因调查，不许提修复方案
- 每一步都要验证 → 完成 ≠ 做完，验证通过才算完成
适配说明
原版为 Claude Code/Codex 设计，WorkBuddy 版做了以下适配：
- 子代理调度：
sessions_spawn→ WorkBuddyAgent工具 +TaskCreate - 代码审查：Claude Code Task → WorkBuddy
Agent（审查子代理） - 文件路径约定：
docs/superpowers/→docs/plans/ - 语言支持：中英双语描述，代码示例以 Python/TypeScript 为主
- 移除了
using-git-worktrees（WorkBuddy 场景不常用）
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 51 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 73d37816e168
using-superpowers is a skill published in the GitHub repository yinqd3/workbuddy-skills (6 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 709 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.
testing-agents-with-subagents
Test agents via subagents: known inputs, captured outputs, verification.
tdd
TDD with red-green-refactor loop and vertical slices. Triggers: TDD, test-first, red-green-refactor, test driving development.
triage-issue
Bug triage: explores codebase for root cause, files GitHub issue with TDD fix plan. Triggers: triage, investigate bug, fix plan, root cause, file issue, bug report.
test-driven-development
RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle with strict phase gates for TDD.
tdd-workflow
Enforce practical Test-Driven Development for code changes in Go services. Use for new features, bug fixes, refactors, API changes, and new modules. Requires Red-Green-Refactor evidence, defect-hypothesis-driven tests, killer cases, and coverage gates (line + risk-path).