Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yogsoth-ai/stress-test --skill alternative-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/stress-testWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/alternative-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/alternative-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/alternative-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/alternative-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/alternative-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00705 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00282 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
alternative-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to alternative-analysis — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Alternative Analysis Strategy
CIA SAT alternative analysis: generate multiple competing interpretations to prevent anchoring on a single explanation.
Method
- alternative-futures builds 2-4 divergent scenarios from the same evidence base
- What-If Analysis: systematically vary key variables to explore outcome sensitivity
- Four Ways of Seeing: examine artifact through lenses of opportunity, risk, structure, and agency
- probe-execution tests each alternative against available evidence
- Diagnostic indicators identified that would discriminate between alternatives
- finding-aggregation compares explanatory power across alternatives
Budget Table
| Parameter | S | M | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attack vectors | 5 | 12 | 20 |
| Probing rounds | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| Personas | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Assumption checks | 5 | 10 | 20 |
Orchestration
threat-surface-mapping → [identify variable dimensions]
→ alternative-futures (generate 2-4 scenarios)
→ [for each alternative]:
attack-vector-generation (find discriminating tests)
→ probe-execution (test alternative)
→ finding-aggregation → attack-resilience-scoring
Subagents
- threat-surface-mapping (dimension identification)
- alternative-futures (scenario generation)
- attack-vector-generation (discriminating test design)
- probe-execution (alternative testing)
- finding-aggregation (comparative synthesis)
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| adversarial-roleplay | Tactic: Construct detailed hostile persona, attack artifact from that persona's perspective, record successful attack paths for aggregation. |
| structured-attack-campaign | Tactic: Full attack lifecycle — threat surface enumeration, attack vector generation, systematic probing, and finding aggregation across all surfaces. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 86 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A e87243e4bfa9
alternative-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository yogsoth-ai/stress-test (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 705 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to alternative-analysis, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
tournament-judge
Runs a domain-neutral, evidence-based tournament in which independent candidates are reviewed, anonymized, and scored by a blind judge against a rubric fixed before judging. Use when comparing competing plans, designs, implementations, documents, tools, vendors, strategies, or other substantial options; when the user…
sector-rotation
An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
browser_cdp
A health check for Python code that produces a score, letter grade, and measures of issues such as complexity, duplication, dead code, dependencies, and architecture.
aiwg-regenerate-copilot
Regenerate copilot-instructions.md for GitHub Copilot with vendor-specific content only.
config-validator
Validate AIWG configuration files and project setup for correctness and completeness.