Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yogsoth-ai/stress-test --skill counterexample-heuristicsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/stress-testWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/counterexample-heuristics)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/counterexample-heuristics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/counterexample-heuristics/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/counterexample-heuristics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/counterexample-heuristics.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00426 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00213 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
counterexample-heuristics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Counterexample Heuristics
Orchestration Steps
- Receive claim/theorem from strategy
- Dispatch
counterexample-generationto produce candidate monsters - For each counterexample:
a. Dispatch
monster-barring-attempt— can it be excluded legitimately? b. If barring succeeds: record as excluded, note narrowed scope c. If barring fails: counterexample is genuine - For genuine counterexamples, dispatch
claim-refinement:- Incorporate as lemma (add condition to claim)
- Or weaken claim scope
- Report: original claim, counterexamples found, refined claim
Subagents
- counterexample-generation
- monster-barring-attempt
- claim-refinement
Termination Conditions
- All generated counterexamples resolved (barred or incorporated)
- Claim refined to survive all counterexamples (success)
- Claim collapses entirely under counterexamples (falsified)
- Budget exhausted (report current state)
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| claim-refinement | Propose a refined claim that survives counterexamples while preserving maximum explanatory power (Lakatos lemma-incorporation). |
| counterexample-generation | Systematically generate counterexamples (monsters) to a given claim using diverse heuristic strategies. |
| monster-barring-attempt | Attempt to exclude a counterexample as illegitimate by tightening definitions or preconditions (Lakatos monster-barring). |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 58 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A b716bc068c21
counterexample-heuristics is a skill published in the GitHub repository yogsoth-ai/stress-test (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 426 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
relax-dev-debug
Develop and debug the Relax reinforcement learning project. Use this skill whenever modifying code in the relax/ directory, or running remote training jobs on a Ray cluster for validation. Also use it when the user mentions training, debugging training runs, submitting Ray jobs, or fixing training errors.
research-ideation
Quant-focused research ideation pipeline: scope selection (3 stages) → anchor-first literature grounding → single-core idea generation → iterative refinement → ELO tournament ranking (Final = N+R+C−D) → update evo-memory → user selects direction → expand into manuscript-quality proposal. Optimized for incremental…
quant-experiment-runtime
Quant research experiment executor: discover an offline source database under the workdir's code-repo, build a panel, run a Research Artifact's entry point to compute research-object values, and evaluate IC/ICIR/RANKIC/coverage metrics. Runtime = Experiment Executor; it runs a Research Artifact via a Python-native…
local-paper-navigator
Find and read papers from the local papers library (repo papers/, mounted at /papers/). Three native tools form a reading funnel: papersearch (one line per paper), paperread (card + section outline), papersection (one verbatim section — the only full-text access). Use when: find papers in the local library, read a…
experiment-pipeline
Guides structured 4-stage experiment execution with attempt budgets and gate conditions: Stage 1 initial implementation (reproduce baseline), Stage 2 hyperparameter tuning, Stage 3 proposed method validation, Stage 4 ablation study. Integrates with evo-memory (load prior strategies, trigger IVE/ESE) and…
paper-review
Guides self-review of YOUR OWN academic paper before submission with adversarial stress-testing. Core method: 5-aspect checklist (contribution sufficiency, writing clarity, results quality, testing completeness, method design), counterintuitive protocol (reject-first simulation, delete unsupported claims, score trust…