Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yogsoth-ai/stress-test --skill critic-defender-judgegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/stress-testWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/critic-defender-judge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/critic-defender-judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/critic-defender-judge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/critic-defender-judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/critic-defender-judge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00763 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00381 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
critic-defender-judge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Critic-Defender-Judge Strategy
Classic adversarial triangle: one agent attacks, one defends, one judges.
Method
- debate-architect designs attack vectors based on artifact type
- debate-critic generates structured attacks using Toulmin model
- debate-defender responds with counter-evidence and rebuttals
- debate-judge evaluates exchange quality and produces round verdict
- Repeat with escalating pressure (dialectical-escalation tactic)
Budget Table
| Parameter | S | M | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debate rounds | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| Participating agents | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Coverage dimensions | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| External evidence searches | 2 | 5 | 10 |
Orchestration
debate-architect → [for each round]:
debate-critic → debate-defender → debate-judge
→ confidence-calibration → (escalate or terminate)
→ debate-transcript-analysis → verdict-synthesis
Subagents
- debate-architect (structure design)
- debate-critic (attack generation)
- debate-defender (defense generation)
- debate-judge (round adjudication)
- confidence-calibration (escalation decision)
- evidence-scout (when evidence-tournament tactic active)
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| evidence-tournament | Tactic: Evidence gathering, cross-examination, and quality judgment. External evidence is collected, presented, challenged, and scored for relevance and reliability. |
| stress-test-dialectical-escalation | Tactic: Progressive debate escalation based on confidence thresholds. Each round increases attack sophistication until defender collapses or proves resilient. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| confidence-calibration | Calibrates confidence scores based on debate progression. Determines whether to escalate, continue, or terminate based on cumulative evidence. |
| debate-architect | Designs debate structure based on artifact type — selects attack vectors, assigns perspectives, determines escalation ladder, and configures round parameters. |
| debate-critic | Generates structured criticism from attack stance using Toulmin model. Produces claims, grounds, warrants, and rebuttals targeting artifact weaknesses. |
| debate-defender | Responds to attacks with counter-evidence and counter-arguments. Defends artifact using evidence, clarification, and rebuttal while acknowledging valid criticisms. |
| debate-judge | Evaluates debate exchanges, adjudicates argument quality, and produces round verdicts with confidence scores and reasoning. |
| evidence-scout | Searches for external evidence supporting or opposing specific claims. Returns structured evidence with source assessment and relevance scoring. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 87 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 881d7a35d3ae
critic-defender-judge is a skill published in the GitHub repository yogsoth-ai/stress-test (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 763 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
tournament-judge
Runs a domain-neutral, evidence-based tournament in which independent candidates are reviewed, anonymized, and scored by a blind judge against a rubric fixed before judging. Use when comparing competing plans, designs, implementations, documents, tools, vendors, strategies, or other substantial options; when the user…
sector-rotation
An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.
browser_cdp
A health check for Python code that produces a score, letter grade, and measures of issues such as complexity, duplication, dead code, dependencies, and architecture.
shogun-screenshot
A screenshot tool for getting images from a computer or web page and then cropping, resizing, or masking sensitive information. Playwright is a browser-automation tool used here to capture web pages.
creating-skills
Guide for creating Claude Code skills following Anthropic's official best practices. Use when user wants to create a new skill, build a skill, write SKILL.md, update an existing skill, or needs skill creation guidelines. Provides structure, frontmatter fields, naming conventions, and new features like dynamic context…
config-validator
Validate AIWG configuration files and project setup for correctness and completeness.