Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yogsoth-ai/stress-test --skill evidence-tournamentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/stress-testWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/evidence-tournament)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/evidence-tournament"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/evidence-tournament/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/evidence-tournament"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/evidence-tournament.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00641 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00320 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
evidence-tournament scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evidence Tournament Tactic
Structured evidence competition — gather, present, cross-examine, and judge evidence quality.
Orchestration
- evidence-scout searches for evidence supporting the artifact's claims
- evidence-scout searches for evidence opposing the artifact's claims
- debate-critic presents opposing evidence as structured arguments
- debate-defender presents supporting evidence as counter-arguments
- cross-examination probes both evidence sets:
- Source reliability assessment
- Relevance to specific claims
- Recency and applicability
- Potential confounds or alternative interpretations
- debate-judge scores each piece of evidence and produces tournament bracket result
Evidence Quality Criteria
- Relevance: Direct bearing on the claim (0.0–1.0)
- Reliability: Source credibility and methodology (0.0–1.0)
- Recency: Temporal applicability (0.0–1.0)
- Specificity: How precisely it addresses the claim (0.0–1.0)
Subagents Dispatched
- evidence-scout × 2 (pro and con evidence gathering)
- debate-critic (opposing evidence presentation)
- debate-defender (supporting evidence presentation)
- cross-examination (evidence probing)
- debate-judge (evidence scoring and verdict)
Termination Conditions
- All claims have been evidenced and cross-examined
- Evidence search budget exhausted (2/5/10 searches)
- No further relevant evidence discoverable
- Judge has scored all evidence pairs
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| cross-examination | Probes defender responses for inconsistencies, logical gaps, and unsupported claims. Acts as follow-up interrogation after initial defense. |
| debate-critic | Generates structured criticism from attack stance using Toulmin model. Produces claims, grounds, warrants, and rebuttals targeting artifact weaknesses. |
| debate-defender | Responds to attacks with counter-evidence and counter-arguments. Defends artifact using evidence, clarification, and rebuttal while acknowledging valid criticisms. |
| debate-judge | Evaluates debate exchanges, adjudicates argument quality, and produces round verdicts with confidence scores and reasoning. |
| evidence-scout | Searches for external evidence supporting or opposing specific claims. Returns structured evidence with source assessment and relevance scoring. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 73 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 75b4fc2bd9e5
evidence-tournament is a skill published in the GitHub repository yogsoth-ai/stress-test (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 641 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
tournament-judge
Runs a domain-neutral, evidence-based tournament in which independent candidates are reviewed, anonymized, and scored by a blind judge against a rubric fixed before judging. Use when comparing competing plans, designs, implementations, documents, tools, vendors, strategies, or other substantial options; when the user…
sector-rotation
An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
oma-scholar
Scholarly research companion using Knows sidecar spec (.knows.yaml). Generates, validates, reviews, queries, and compares structured research-paper sidecars, and fetches them from knows.academy. Use for academic literature search, survey synthesis, paper authoring assistance, and peer review with token-efficient…
browser_cdp
A health check for Python code that produces a score, letter grade, and measures of issues such as complexity, duplication, dead code, dependencies, and architecture.
shogun-screenshot
A screenshot tool for getting images from a computer or web page and then cropping, resizing, or masking sensitive information. Playwright is a browser-automation tool used here to capture web pages.