Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yogsoth-ai/stress-test --skill process-fmeagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/stress-testWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/process-fmea)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/process-fmea"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/process-fmea/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/process-fmea"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/stress-test/process-fmea.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00870 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00435 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
process-fmea scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Process FMEA Strategy
Analyzes failure modes in the research execution process — not what the design gets wrong, but what can go wrong during implementation.
Method
- function-analysis maps the execution process steps
- failure-mode-extraction identifies process-level failure modes (data collection errors, methodology drift, resource constraints)
- failure-chain-construction traces process failures to outcome impacts
- severity-scoring, occurrence-scoring, detection-scoring rate each mode
- action-priority-matrix classifies priority
- mitigation-design-sop designs process controls
Budget Table
| Parameter | S | M | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Process steps analyzed | 4 | 10 | 20 |
| Failure modes per step | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Chain depth | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Process controls designed | 2 | 6 | 12 |
Orchestration
function-analysis (process mode) → failure-mode-extraction
→ failure-chain-construction
→ [severity-scoring, occurrence-scoring, detection-scoring] (parallel)
→ action-priority-matrix → mitigation-design-sop
→ re-scoring
Subagents
- function-analysis (process step mapping)
- failure-mode-extraction (process failure identification)
- failure-chain-construction (process-to-outcome chains)
- severity-scoring, occurrence-scoring, detection-scoring (S/O/D)
- action-priority-matrix (priority classification)
- mitigation-design-sop (process control design)
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| failure-chain-tracing | Tactic: Trace upstream causes and downstream effects of each failure mode. Builds multi-level cause-mode-effect chains for systemic understanding. |
| mitigation-validation | Tactic: Run mini-FMEA on proposed mitigations to verify they do not introduce new failure modes. Prevents mitigation-induced risks. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 92 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 57ab21a53cbb
process-fmea is a skill published in the GitHub repository yogsoth-ai/stress-test (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 870 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
relax-dev-debug
Develop and debug the Relax reinforcement learning project. Use this skill whenever modifying code in the relax/ directory, or running remote training jobs on a Ray cluster for validation. Also use it when the user mentions training, debugging training runs, submitting Ray jobs, or fixing training errors.
research-ideation
Quant-focused research ideation pipeline: scope selection (3 stages) → anchor-first literature grounding → single-core idea generation → iterative refinement → ELO tournament ranking (Final = N+R+C−D) → update evo-memory → user selects direction → expand into manuscript-quality proposal. Optimized for incremental…
quant-experiment-runtime
Quant research experiment executor: discover an offline source database under the workdir's code-repo, build a panel, run a Research Artifact's entry point to compute research-object values, and evaluate IC/ICIR/RANKIC/coverage metrics. Runtime = Experiment Executor; it runs a Research Artifact via a Python-native…
local-paper-navigator
Find and read papers from the local papers library (repo papers/, mounted at /papers/). Three native tools form a reading funnel: papersearch (one line per paper), paperread (card + section outline), papersection (one verbatim section — the only full-text access). Use when: find papers in the local library, read a…
experiment-pipeline
Guides structured 4-stage experiment execution with attempt budgets and gate conditions: Stage 1 initial implementation (reproduce baseline), Stage 2 hyperparameter tuning, Stage 3 proposed method validation, Stage 4 ablation study. Integrates with evo-memory (load prior strategies, trigger IVE/ESE) and…
paper-review
Guides self-review of YOUR OWN academic paper before submission with adversarial stress-testing. Core method: 5-aspect checklist (contribution sufficiency, writing clarity, results quality, testing completeness, method design), counterintuitive protocol (reject-first simulation, delete unsupported claims, score trust…