Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/design-shipnpx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill design-shipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/design-ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/design-ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yonatangross/orchestkit/design-ship.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.02402 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.01201 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00480 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00240 |
Grade A, and why
design-ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 269 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design Ship
One command: Claude Design handoff URL → reviewable GitHub PR.
/ork:design-ship https://claude.ai/design/abc123 # From handoff URL
/ork:design-ship /tmp/handoff-bundle.json # From local file
When to use
You have a Claude Design handoff URL (or file) and want a PR opened against the current branch. No intermediate steps, no manual test generation, no manual PR drafting.
For just-the-import (no tests, no PR), use /ork:design-import instead.
Pipeline
Handoff bundle (URL or file)
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. /ork:design-import │ Scaffold components, write provenance
│ (delegates to orchestrator │ Tokens reconciled
│ for parse + dedup) │ Components written or reused
└──────────┬───────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. /ork:cover │ Storybook stories per new component
│ (Storybook + Playwright) │ Playwright E2E for new routes/views
└──────────┬───────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. /ork:expect │ Diff-aware browser verification
│ (CDP + ARIA-tree-first) │ Screenshots saved for PR body
└──────────┬───────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────────┐
│ 4. /ork:create-pr │ PR opened with:
│ │ - Claude Design URL link
│ │ - Before/after screenshots
│ │ - Component scaffold list
│ │ - Coverage delta
│ │ - Label: claude-design
└──────────┬───────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────────┐
│ 5. UPDATE PROVENANCE │ Patch .claude/design-handoffs/<id>.json
│ │ with the opened PR number + URL
└──────────────────────────────┘
Pre-flight
Before starting the pipeline, verify the working tree is clean enough to ship:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 269 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 196114713f35
design-ship is a skill published in the GitHub repository yonatangross/orchestkit (229 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 2,402 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
screen-reader-testing
Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Use when validating screen reader compatibility, debugging accessibility issues, or ensuring assistive technology support.
accessibility-selenium-testing
Accessibility testing toolkit using Selenium WebDriver 4+ with Java 21+ and axe-core engine. Use when asked to validate WCAG 2.2 AA compliance, scan pages or components for a11y violations, test keyboard navigation, audit color contrast, check ARIA semantics, generate accessibility reports, filter axe rules, debug…
testing-react
Stratégie de Tests React 19 + Compiler 1.0. Use when writing tests, reviewing test coverage, or setting up testing.
hatch3r-a11y-audit
Runs a WCAG AA accessibility audit with findings and fixes across 7 scan categories (keyboard, contrast, ARIA, reduced motion, screen reader, high contrast, automated axe). Use when auditing and remediating accessibility.
visual-validate
Validate UI changes in a real browser using Chrome DevTools or Playwright MCP. Takes screenshots, compares before/after, exercises interactions, captures console errors. Use when user asks to "visual validate", "/visual-validate", "check the UI", "screenshot before/after", or finishes a UI change. Don't use for unit…
run-smoke-tests
Run Playwright smoke tests, debug failures, and verify fixes. Use for smoke, e2e, Playwright, or pre-ship browser verification.