Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter --skill technical-researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yudefine/nuxt-supabase-starter/technical-research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yudefine/nuxt-supabase-starter/technical-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yudefine/nuxt-supabase-starter/technical-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yudefine/nuxt-supabase-starter/technical-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yudefine/nuxt-supabase-starter/technical-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.01032 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00516 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
technical-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Technical Research
technical-research 同時產出研究過程與技術堆疊真相:research.md 留在 plan package,specs/truth/techstack.md 是整個系統目前唯一 techstack truth。
SOP
Phase 1 -- 對齊 plan 與 techstack truth
- READ 讀取使用者需求、呼叫者要求、目標 plan package 的
spec.md、既有research.md、truth-delta.md、specs/truth/techstack.md與必要 codebase 邊界。 - READ 讀取
templates/research.md、templates/research.example.md、templates/techstack.md與templates/techstack.example.md,確認 research 與 techstack 的責任邊界。 - READ 讀取
rules/Research輸出定位與spec後接續判準.md,確認research.md寫入 plan package、techstack.md寫入specs/truth/techstack.md。 - READ 讀取
.agents/constitution/CONSTITUTION.md、.agents/constitution/shared.md、.agents/constitution/skills/technical-research/research.md與.agents/constitution/skills/technical-research/techstack.md。
Phase 2 -- 收斂研究缺口與 truth 變更風險
- READ 讀取
rules/AIxBDD必問問題與起始專案介面澄清判準.md,對過spec.md、既有techstack.md與使用者這輪原話,標出尚未拍板的必問題。 - DELEGATE 若 BDD techstack、測試策略、或起始專案下系統有哪些端尚未拍板,呼叫
/clarify;未問完前停止,不進入 Phase 3。 - THINK 必問題已拍板後,再從
spec.md與現有 techstack truth 整理其餘要拍板的核心決策、候選方案、已知限制、比較面向與成功條件。 - READ 若需要判斷其餘缺口是否升級 clarify,讀取
rules/Clarify升級門檻與研究提問預算判準.md。 - DELEGATE 若其餘缺口會改變決策集合、候選方案、技術邊界,或高影響修改/刪除既有 techstack truth,呼叫
/clarify;未收斂前停止。
Phase 3 -- 產出 research 與更新 techstack truth
- READ 需要確認 research 與 techstack 最小必要資訊時,讀取
rules/研究artifact最小必要資訊判準.md與rules/techstack-artifact最小必要資訊判準.md。 - WRITE 將 decision-driven 研究內容寫入
specs/plans/NNN-<slug>/research.md。 - WRITE 依現有 truth 與本輪決策更新
specs/truth/techstack.md,使其代表目前系統完整技術堆疊,不保留「以某 plan 為準」的分散說法。 - THINK 將 techstack truth 改動整理為語意單元層級的 ADD / MODIFY / DELETE / NOOP 列。
Phase 4 -- 更新 truth-delta 並交付
- DELEGATE 呼叫
/truth-delta,傳入 plan package、truth root、owner/technical-research與本輪 techstack truth 改動列。 - WRITE 向使用者回報
research.md、specs/truth/techstack.md、truth-delta.md、主要技術決策與殘餘風險。
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- LICENSE 1.2 KB
- rules/AIxBDD必問問題與起始專案介面澄清判準.md 6.8 KB
- rules/Clarify升級門檻與研究提問預算判準.md 4.7 KB
- rules/Research輸出定位與spec後接續判準.md 1.4 KB
- rules/techstack-artifact最小必要資訊判準.md 5.3 KB
- rules/研究artifact最小必要資訊判準.md 4.1 KB
- specformula.md 2.9 KB
- templates/research.example.md 5.9 KB
- templates/research.md 1.3 KB
- templates/techstack.example.md 1.4 KB
- templates/techstack.md 1.8 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · -1 lines 6cadb1445559
- yesterday First seen · 47 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A 3a14b2ce5257
technical-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter (45 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 1,032 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.
Other skills, from other repositories
prd-v07-implementation-loop
Execute implementation within EPICs following test-first development, continuous SoT updates, and code traceability during PRD v0.7 Build Execution. Triggers on requests to start building, implement an epic, begin coding, or when user asks "start building", "implement epic", "coding", "development", "build execution"…
prd-v07-test-planning
Define test cases BEFORE implementation, ensuring every API, business rule, and user journey has verifiable acceptance criteria during PRD v0.7 Build Execution. Triggers on requests to define tests, plan test coverage, create test cases, or when user asks "define tests", "test planning", "what to test?", "test cases"…
strict-tdd
Strict RED->GREEN->REFACTOR test-driven development with enforcement. Never write production code before a failing test. Atomic commits per TDD cycle.
prd-v04-user-journey-mapping
Map user missions from trigger to value moment, organizing features into coherent paths during PRD v0.4 User Journeys. Triggers on requests to map user journeys, define user flows, describe how users accomplish goals, or when user asks "map user journeys", "define user flows", "user missions", "how do users accomplish…
atomic-tdd
Test-first discipline. Auto-triggers on "let's implement X", "add feature Y", "fix bug Z", "write a test for", "implement", "build out", and similar pre-code-change phrases. Iron rule: failing test exists before production code. Skip only for pure docs/config changes with an explicit "skipped because:" note. Explicit…
use-tdd
Implement a requested increment with red-green-refactor. Use when the user types /use-tdd.