Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add YujxZJCN/teaching-skills --skill submission-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/YujxZJCN/teaching-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/submission-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/submission-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/submission-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/submission-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/submission-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00164 | $0.01998 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00066 | $0.00799 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00400 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00200 |
Grade A, and why
submission-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Submission Auditor — Specification-Driven Submission Review
Turns "here's my standard, check their work against it" into a disciplined three-step flow: compile the spec → audit with located evidence → report at two altitudes (per-student feedback, class-level patterns). The professor's standard is the law; this skill makes it checkable, applies it consistently across every submission, and reports honestly about which checks were mechanical and which were judgment.
Prime rule: an audit finding without a location in the student's work does not exist. Every finding cites where it looked ("§3 Results, p.2: figure has no caption"), and every judgment-type finding quotes the evidence it judged. "Generally weak formatting" is not a finding.
Quick Start
Here's my lab report template — check these 40 submissions against it
这是我的实验报告模板，帮我检查这批学生提交的格式和内容是否符合要求
Does this thesis draft meet our department's format requirements? (attach both)
Build a submission checklist students can self-check before the deadline
Modes
| Mode | Trigger intent | Output |
|---|---|---|
spec |
"Here's my template/requirements" (first contact with a new standard) | Compiled Submission Spec — every requirement made checkable, classified deterministic vs judgment, confirmed at a checkpoint |
audit |
"Check this submission" with a spec (or material to compile one) | Audit findings + per-student feedback report draft |
batch-audit |
"Check these N submissions" | Per-student reports + class-level pattern report + consistency record |
self-check |
"Make a checklist students can use themselves" | Student-facing self-check version of the spec (deterministic checks only, supportive phrasing) |
calibrate |
"The audit was too strict/lenient on X" or professor reviews a sample | Spec revision pass: tighten/loosen checks against professor verdicts on sampled findings; revisions logged in the spec |
Mode dispatch rule: no confirmed spec yet → spec mode always runs first, whatever
was asked. Auditing against an unconfirmed standard produces authoritative-looking
reports built on guesses — the blueprint-first rule of assessment-architect, applied
to checking.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago First seen · 143 lines · 164 tokens per session scan A 6083848b9e7d
submission-auditor is a skill published in the GitHub repository YujxZJCN/teaching-skills (41 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 164 tokens to every session and 1,998 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
education-expert
Expert-level education technology, learning management systems, and ed-tech platforms. Use when the user mentions edtech, lms, e learning, or assessment, or when the task involves Educational Technology or Standards.
edtech-expert
Expert in education technology, adaptive learning, student analytics, virtual classrooms, assessment tools, and learning management systems. Use when the user mentions education, e learning, lms, adaptive learning, student analytics, or virtual classroom, or when the task involves Learning Management Systems, Virtual…
e-learning-expert
Build comprehensive e-learning solutions including course management, student engagement, assessment systems, and learning analytics. Use when the user mentions an LMS, online courses, SCORM or xAPI, student engagement, assessments and grading, or learning analytics.
criterion-referenced-rubric-generator
Generate a criterion-referenced rubric with descriptive performance levels for a task or objective. Use for marking guides and general curriculum contexts. For Manning programmes where Competent = success, use coherent-rubric-logic-builder instead.
feedback-quality-analyser
Analyse existing written feedback for quality, specificity, actionability, and impact on student learning. Use when reviewing teacher or peer feedback to improve feedback practices.
retrieval-practice-generator
Generate retrieval practice questions at varied difficulty levels for a topic or concept. Use when creating quiz starters, revision activities, or low-stakes testing materials.