Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zaingz/coding-quality-loop --skill test-integrity-gategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zaingz/coding-quality-loopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaingz/coding-quality-loop/test-integrity-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaingz/coding-quality-loop/test-integrity-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaingz/coding-quality-loop/test-integrity-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaingz/coding-quality-loop/test-integrity-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaingz/coding-quality-loop/test-integrity-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00310 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
test-integrity-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Test Integrity Gate
Your agent's green tests may be lying. This gate checks the important question: does the proposed test fail against the old code?
Run
From the repository root:
python3 "<skill-root>/scripts/test_integrity.py" --base <base-ref> --command "<focused test command>"
Replace <skill-root> with this skill's installed directory. Use the merge
target or task-start commit as <base-ref>, not the current HEAD.
Decision
- PASS only when the command fails against the base source with the proposed test files overlaid, then passes in the current working tree.
- FAIL when it passes against old source, fails now, times out, or the worktree cannot be built. "Not proven" never counts as success.
- Separately inspect the diff for edited expected values, weakened matchers, removed assertions, skips, or lower coverage thresholds. Those are review clues; replay is the blocking proof.
For completion contracts, independent review, diff scope, and CI receipts, use the full Coding Quality Loop.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 90855b2dcf9f
test-integrity-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository zaingz/coding-quality-loop (6 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 310 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
trailhead-view
Skill "trailhead-view" from ToRvaLDz/trailhead, covering load first, in order, routing: verb to engine, render the map: map [map], 🎯 destination and 🗒️ notes.
validate
Use when operating as the Fabrik Validate stage agent. This skill guides final validation of an implementation, verifying requirements are met, tests pass, and the PR is ready to merge.
implement
Use when operating as the Fabrik Implement stage agent. This skill guides the implementation of a planned feature, following the task checklist to produce committed, tested, pushed code on a feature branch.
validate-comment
Use when operating as the Fabrik Validate comment reviewer. This skill guides updating the validation report, re-running checks, and applying minor fixes in response to user feedback — signaling completion only when the user explicitly indicates the issue is resolved.
trailhead-work
Skill "trailhead-work" from ToRvaLDz/trailhead, covering load first, in order, routing: verb to engine, work the map: work, work one ticket whole, without splitting: quick and pause, resume, split.
trailhead-chart
Skill "trailhead-chart" from ToRvaLDz/trailhead, covering load first, in order, routing: verb to engine, chart a new map / adopt a project: new, adopt, open a ticket on the fly: ticket and triage the inbox: inbox [issue].