Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zapgun-ai/clawback --skill submit-smokegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zapgun-ai/clawbackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zapgun-ai/clawback/submit-smoke)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zapgun-ai/clawback/submit-smoke"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zapgun-ai/clawback/submit-smoke/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zapgun-ai/clawback/submit-smoke"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zapgun-ai/clawback/submit-smoke.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00924 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00462 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
submit-smoke scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 67 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9f02a2f80518
submit-smoke is a skill published in the GitHub repository zapgun-ai/clawback (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 924 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
hyper-tdd
Use when about to write or modify behavior-bearing code — functions, business logic, bug fixes — before writing any production code. Also when the user invokes /hyperclaude:hyper-tdd. Forces a failing test first so you watch it fail for the right reason.
pwp-test
Testing strategy and implementation protocol — structured quality assurance that catches real bugs. Use this skill whenever the user asks to write tests, add test coverage, set up a testing strategy, or asks 'how should I test this'. Also use when they say 'add tests', 'write tests for this', 'test coverage', 'what…
add-check
Scaffolds a new scoring category under src/checks/, adjusts the weights in src/score.js, and reminds you to write the corresponding test.
refactor-safely
Restructure existing code safely without changing externally observable behavior. Composes context, design, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a characterization-first refactoring workflow. Use when the user says 'refactor this', 'clean this up', 'untangle this module', 'move this to the right…
code-standards
Apply a disciplined engineering workflow to any code change. Use whenever implementing a feature, fixing a bug, or refactoring — before writing code, not after. Walks orient → baseline → smallest change → test → verify → self-review, and enforces language-agnostic hard gates (don't mass-reformat, keep the linter and…
php-testing
Use when writing/configuring tests on a non-Laravel PHP project — PHPUnit vs Pest. Do NOT use for Laravel test helpers or quality tooling (php-quality-tooling).