Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/codebase-review-swarmnpx skills add ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm --skill codebase-review-swarmgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/codebase-review-swarm)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/codebase-review-swarm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/codebase-review-swarm.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00331 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00166 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-review-swarm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Codebase Review Swarm
Read and follow ../../../.opencode/skills/codebase-review-swarm/SKILL.md as
the canonical workflow.
Codex Execution Notes
- Treat this as a read-only review workflow. Do not modify source files.
- Write review artifacts only under
.swarm/review-v8/runs/<run_id>/. - Run Phase 0 inventory first and stop for review-mode selection unless the user already selected tracks and explicitly authorized continuing.
- Preserve the skill's evidence rule: no quote, no claim.
- For dispatch lanes, only if the session actually exposes the controller's
lane tools, treat
outputas a preview and callretrieve_lane_outputfor fulloutput_refartifacts before consuming ledgers, counting candidates, routing validation, or declaring coverage clean; when those tools are absent, treat inlineoutputas the full artifact and disclose any truncation as an explicit coverage limitation. - Use
rg, focused file reads, targeted shell commands, and independent validation to close coverage units before writing the final report. - If the user asks for fixes after the report, start a separate implementation workflow rather than editing during the review run.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +2 lines e39413c69258
- 7d ago First seen · 30 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 063668870a60
codebase-review-swarm is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm (463 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 331 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
armada-ledger
Pick the right ledger for a finding. Use when writing defects, adversarial findings, or security findings. Triggers on: ledger, defect, adversarial, security finding, DEF-001, ADV-001, SEC-001.
armada-pr
PR-first finish for a feature lane. Use before reporting a feature done. Triggers on: PR, finish feature, gh pr create, merge, lane complete.
ax-annotation
@AX code annotation workflow skill for agent-driven tag application.
generic-fullstack-code-reviewer
Review full-stack code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, input validation, GPU-accelerated animations, and design system consistency. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
code-review
You are a senior code reviewer. You receive diffs via stdin.
armada-gate
Run an evidence-gate checklist for each success criterion in the current phase. Use when checking if a phase is complete before marking it passed.