hyper-auto

An automated development workflow that first creates and reviews a software plan, then implements and hardens that plan. It stops if the planning stage cannot reach an acceptable result.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when you have a task description but no completed plan and want the workflow to plan, implement, and review the change.
Why use it?
It joins planning and implementation into one workflow, reducing the need to manually move work between those phases.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zeikar/hyperclaude/hyper-auto
Any agent
npx skills add zeikar/hyperclaude --skill hyper-auto
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zeikar/hyperclaude

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 80 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,641 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00080 $0.01641
Opus 5 $0.00040 $0.00821
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00328
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00164

Measured 2d ago against content hash 56a9da568d18, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

hyper-auto scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/hyper-auto/SKILL.md · 84 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

hyper-auto — chain hyper-plan-loop into hyper-implement-loop

Single-gesture pipeline: hyper-plan-loop converges → hyper-implement-loop runs on the produced plan. Stops cleanly at any terminal state in between. No cron, no merge, no push, no autonomous follow-up rounds — just the two loops, chained.

When to use

  • User has a task description and wants the full plan-harden → implement-harden chain in one go.

When to skip

  • A plan already exists → use /hyperclaude:hyper-implement-loop directly.
  • User wants to inspect / hand-edit the plan before implementing → use /hyperclaude:hyper-plan-loop, then decide.

Procedure

Step 1 — Run hyper-plan-loop

Invoke /hyperclaude:hyper-plan-loop <task> with the user's task description verbatim. Let it run to terminal state.

Step 2 — Branch on plan-loop's terminal state

  • Clean exit (no blocking findings — plan-loop converged) → capture the plan path from the loop's report, proceed to Step 3.
  • Cap reached (plan-loop's "revise loop" report — blocking findings still open after the 10-review budget) → STOP. Surface plan-loop's terminal report verbatim. Do NOT proceed.
  • Any other terminal failure (bridge failure, planner-write/format failure, reply-contract failure, unparseable review, etc.) → STOP, surface the underlying report verbatim.

Implementing on a plan with unresolved blocking findings wastes the implement-loop budget on a known-broken input — this is the safety boundary.

Step 3 — Run hyper-implement-loop

Invoke /hyperclaude:hyper-implement-loop <plan-path-from-Step-1> with the canonical plan path captured from plan-loop's report. Let it run to terminal state.

Step 4 — Auto-recap, then compose the report

On a clean composed exit (guard below), FIRST run the terminal recap, THEN emit the composed report so the report can quote the actual written recap path. On any non-clean terminal the recap is skipped entirely.

Clean-exit guard. Auto-recap fires ONLY when ALL of these hold:

  • plan-loop exited clean (Step 2's clean-exit branch — not cap/failure), AND
  • implement-loop reached its Step 7 review-convergence report (not a Step 6 cap/failure STOP), AND
  • that Step 7's fix(review): convergence commit reported SUCCESS (commit SHA + clean tree) OR SKIP (nothing staged, clean tree).

Read the full file on GitHub · 84 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 84 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 56a9da568d18

Subscribe to this mod's changes

hyper-auto is a skill published in the GitHub repository zeikar/hyperclaude (3 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 1,641 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.