Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zenstory-ai/oh-story-dsh --skill game-qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zenstory-ai/oh-story-dshWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zenstory-ai/oh-story-dsh/game-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zenstory-ai/oh-story-dsh/game-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zenstory-ai/oh-story-dsh/game-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zenstory-ai/oh-story-dsh/game-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zenstory-ai/oh-story-dsh/game-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00146 | $0.00703 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00073 | $0.00351 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
game-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to game-qa — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
游戏质量验证
验证当前候选能否完成最小可玩闭环，不把自动化结果包装成趣味、平衡、权利或发布质量结论。
读取 qa-contract.md 定判据，按 test-design-method.md 设计最少但有区分力的检查。
产物语言由 PRODUCT_BRIEF.md 锁定；未锁定时跟随对话语言，不默认产出中文。
唯一必需合同
每个候选都必须用真实运行证据覆盖：launch、render、input、coreLoop、outcome、restart。
targetFinish 描述成色，不改变这组六项，也不得生成第七道门。
执行
- 读取
targetRuntime、testedRuntime和权威 verify；与 PRODUCT_BRIEF/BUILD_BRIEF 冲突时先报错， 不由 QA 猜值。 - 只运行一次权威 verify：它在 testedRuntime 从 clean start → 核心动作 → 设计结果 → restart 完成整条路径，并记录 command、exit code、环境、六项结果、最小证据和实际失败。
- 对照 GAME_DESIGN 中会改变结果的不变量和三段弧结束标记；只验证批准的设计承诺，不遍历所有 代码路径。
- 若候选有可执行模型、事件日志、patch 或
signature_command，按 test-design-method 的对应合同把 项目回归嵌入同一权威 verify；失败映射到已有 checks 或 limitation，不另跑命令或新增门禁。 - 记录 limitation 和问题的 product/design/art/build 归属。趣味、长期平衡、留存和商业价值只能写成 未验证风险，不给确定性 PASS。
优先使用已有可观察状态；只有无法判断结果时才增加最小测试钩子。不要为了 QA 重构游戏或强制某种 框架、测试库或调试接口。
输出
qa/verification.json：唯一 QA 事实源，包含三态 status、权威命令、complete run、六项 checks、 一条证据路径和 limitations；字段与证据要求见 qa-contract.md。
缺口写结构化 limitation，不发明 PASS_WITH_GAPS；未运行或失败的必需项不能满足整体 PASS。
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · -10 lines 5f76bc51fe89
- 12d ago First seen · 51 lines · 146 tokens per session scan A 6835e17fcdec
game-qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository zenstory-ai/oh-story-dsh (338 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 146 tokens to every session and 703 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to game-qa, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
dsh-web-pet-developer
Create a pet for the dsh-pet plugin and integrate it into the dsh web GUI — author a v2 pet.json manifest plus an 8-column x 9-row atlas per the Codex/hatch-pet contract (live2d pets, voice packs and status decorations included), drop it into the pet-center user directory or contribute it as a built-in asset under…
daytona-windows-cert
Run the verified Windows repro for iPolloWork enterprise TLS behavior: install a fake corporate CA into the Windows machine store, serve healthy and broken HTTPS control planes, install a Windows build, and prove the desktop app and spawned runtimes use the operating system trust path.
daytona-recording-artifacts
Use this skill to collect proof that a Daytona UI flow works. Use fraimz before declaring the flow passed. If the user asks to do e2e tests for a feature, frame proof is required unless they explicitly ask for non-UI or mock-only validation.
fraimz
create a fraimz, make fraimz, prove it works, frame proof, PR proof, validate experience, e2e evidence, fraimz.html. The full fraimz loop — frame the claim, drive the real app via CDP, validate/repair, output fraimz.html. Use whenever a task ends with "please create a fraimz" or any change needs end-to-end proof.
run-evals
Launch a real iPolloWork app and run coded eval flows against it. This skill owns launch + run; the prove/repair/verdict loop and evidence standard live in the fraimz skill — load that too for anything that ends in a verdict.
daytona-electron-den
Electron and Den, desktop plus cloud, two-sandbox e2e, cloud auth, marketplace, org policy, worker proxy, provider sync, desktop handoff. Validate Electron against a Daytona Den server with unified proof.