Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/zereight/gitlab-mcp/security-scannpx skills add zereight/gitlab-mcp --skill security-scangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zereight/gitlab-mcpWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00914 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00457 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
security-scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- security-scan — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- security-scan — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Scan
Rapid security sweep for code changes. Faster than a full /review — focused on security only.
When to Use
- Before committing code that touches auth, user input, data storage, or external APIs
- After adding new dependencies
- Quick pre-PR security gate
Scan Protocol
Step 1: Determine Scope
# Default: scan recent changes
git diff --name-only HEAD~1
# Or use provided path
Step 2: Secrets Scan
# Scan for common secret patterns
grep -rn --include="*.{ts,js,py,go,rs,java,cs,yaml,json,env,sh,toml}" \
-e "sk-[A-Za-z0-9]\{32,\}" \
-e "ghp_[A-Za-z0-9]\{36\}" \
-e "AKIA[0-9A-Z]\{16\}" \
-e "api.key\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]\{8,\}" \
-e "password\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]\{4,\}" \
-e "secret\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]\{8,\}" \
.
# Check .env is in .gitignore
cat .gitignore | grep -E "\.env$|\.env\."
CRITICAL: Any match in committed code = immediate blocker.
Step 3: Dependency Audit
Run language-appropriate audit:
# Node.js
npm audit --audit-level=high
# Python
pip-audit # or: safety check
# Rust
cargo audit
# Go
govulncheck ./...
# Java/Maven
mvn dependency-check:check
Report: Count of critical/high severity CVEs and their package names.
Step 4: Input Validation Spot-Check
For changed files that handle user input (API endpoints, form handlers, CLI args):
- Is input validated/sanitized before use?
- Are SQL queries parameterized (no string concatenation)?
- Is HTML output escaped before rendering?
- Are file paths sanitized (no
../traversal)?
Step 5: Auth/Authz Quick Check
For changed files touching auth:
- Is authentication checked BEFORE authorization?
- Are authorization checks on EVERY relevant endpoint?
- Are JWT tokens validated (algorithm + signature + expiry)?
- Are session cookies
HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Strict?
Output Format
## Security Scan Report
**Scope:** [files scanned]
**Date:** [timestamp]
### Secrets
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets found
- ⚠ Found: [file:line — description]
### Dependencies
- Critical CVEs: X
- High CVEs: Y
- Packages: [list if any]
### Input Validation
- [ ] User inputs sanitized in changed files
- ⚠ Risk: [file:line — description]
### Auth
- [ ] Auth/authz checks present on relevant routes
- ⚠ Risk: [file:line — description]
### Verdict
CLEAN / NEEDS ATTENTION / BLOCKER
### Next Steps
- [Action items with file:line references]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 132 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 46afd2a17329
security-scan is a skill published in the GitHub repository zereight/gitlab-mcp (1,939 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 914 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.