Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zernie/vigiles --skill adopt-specgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zernie/vigilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zernie/vigiles/adopt-spec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zernie/vigiles/adopt-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zernie/vigiles/adopt-spec.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 5 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 99 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 111 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 112 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 122 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 124 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01252 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00626 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00250 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
adopt-spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Start a typed CLAUDE.md.spec.ts from an existing hand-written CLAUDE.md (or AGENTS.md). This is the non-destructive adoption path — you keep your existing instruction file as the starting point and get type safety going forward.
Adoption rules
Adoption is the safe, faithful on-ramp — never an upgrade in disguise. These are non-negotiable:
- Faithful. Preserve every rule, command, key file, and prose section as-is. Invent nothing — the spec must compile back to ~the user's existing file.
- Non-destructive. Never edit the original
CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md. Only write the new.spec.ts. Never auto-compileover the file — switching it to spec-managed is a separate, explicit step the user runs with a diff to review. - Don't escalate enforcement. Keep
guidance()asguidance(). Upgrading toenforce()has a cost (config/plugins, possible false positives) and is a separate opt-in step — thestrengthenskill. Adoption is not turning on strict /workflowgating. - Reversible.
vigiles eject <file>hands the file back as plain hand-owned markdown anytime — it's never a one-way door. Tell the user this. - Ask before writing. Present the generated spec and a conversion summary first; write only on the user's yes.
- A lighter touch exists. For no spec at all, inline
<!-- vigiles:enforce ... -->comments are verified byvigiles lintwith the same engine.
Instructions
Step 1: Read the Existing File
Read the target instruction file (default: CLAUDE.md in the repo root). If the user specified a path, use that.
Also check if vigiles is installed: look for vigiles in package.json devDependencies. If not, suggest:
npm install -D vigiles
Step 2: Parse the Structure
Identify these sections in the markdown:
- Commands — lines like
`npm run build` — descriptionor- `command` — description - Key files — lines like
`src/foo.ts` — descriptionlisting important files - Rules —
###headings with**Enforced by:**or**Guidance only**annotations - Prose sections — everything else (positioning, architecture, principles, etc.)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 134 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A f119a2d849de
adopt-spec is a skill published in the GitHub repository zernie/vigiles (15 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,252 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
link-check
Verify @file references in AIWG skills and agents against the linking contract — per-file or corpus-wide, with optional auto-fix.
activity-log
Query and manage the unified .aiwg/activity.log chronological record of AIWG-managed workflow operations.
validate-metadata
Validate AIWG extension definitions against the metadata schema and report errors with field names, line numbers, and remediation hints.
eval-agent
Run evaluation tests against an agent to assess quality and archetype resistance.
hook-enable
Enable the AIWG context hook in platform context files without re-deploying.
mention-lint
Lint @-mentions for style consistency and correctness.