acceptance-driven-development

acceptance-driven-development is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ZeusYue/acceptance-driven-development-skill. It costs 31 tokens per session (1,245 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A development method that defines how a feature or bug fix will be accepted before implementation is considered finished. ADD means Acceptance-Driven Development: work continues until every agreed acceptance criterion has a settled result.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when building features, fixing bugs, changing behavior, or evaluating design options. It helps maintain an AC.md acceptance table, track each criterion, and verify that the implementation meets the agreed outcome.
Why use it?
It prevents developers and agents from treating code changes as complete without checking what “done” means. It also distinguishes approved work from a proposed approach and requires review and verification before completion.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it when building features, fixing bugs, changing behavior, or evaluating design options. It helps maintain an AC.md acceptance table, track each criterion, and verify that the implementation meets the agreed outcome.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zeusyue/acceptance-driven-development-skill/acceptance-driven-development
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ZeusYue/acceptance-driven-development-skill --skill acceptance-driven-development
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZeusYue/acceptance-driven-development-skill

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for acceptance-driven-development

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zeusyue/acceptance-driven-development-skill/acceptance-driven-development/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zeusyue/acceptance-driven-development-skill/acceptance-driven-development)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zeusyue/acceptance-driven-development-skill/acceptance-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zeusyue/acceptance-driven-development-skill/acceptance-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for acceptance-driven-development

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zeusyue/acceptance-driven-development-skill/acceptance-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zeusyue/acceptance-driven-development-skill/acceptance-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,245 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00031 $0.01245
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00498
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00249
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00125

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 55145d806aa3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

acceptance-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/acceptance-driven-development/SKILL.md · 59 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Acceptance-Driven Development

Drive the current authorized work to observable, verified outcomes. Match planning, review, and record keeping to the work. Implementation progress is not acceptance evidence.

Scope and authorization

Apply automatically to project development, including fixes and configuration changes. For discussion, audits, or design requests, provide that requested deliverable; mentioning ADD does not authorize implementation. Explanations and delivery-only operations do not start a development workflow.

A clear request authorizes its stated outcome and necessary ordinary implementation choices. Derive acceptance criteria from that request without asking the user to approve the transcription. Ask when missing information changes a material product decision, expands scope, or authorizes consequences not already covered. Explain the concrete decision and recommendation; continue independent authorized work while it is pending. Honor the user's chosen discussion style and existing authorization across turns.

Establish the current target

Use the request, relevant project instructions, existing acceptance records, and actual code to identify:

  • the outcome and observable passing conditions;
  • the constraints and existing behavior this change must preserve;
  • the checks that can demonstrate those conditions.

Read the relevant context before editing, including current changes and any applicable handoff. Resolve conflicting requirements without presenting inferred preferences as agreed scope. A request to fix one issue does not authorize the rest of the backlog.

For new and resumed work, locate the acceptance source through the request, project instructions, and handoff paths, URLs, issue references, or criterion IDs. When needed, search bounded project locations for acceptance/specification files, skipping dependencies and generated output. Reuse a record only when its authority and scope are clear. A location already declared by the user or project instructions remains valid; do not ask again merely because the file has not been created. If neither an authoritative record nor a declared location can be found, ask the user to specify the acceptance path or URL before creating a durable record. Never silently create one or declare a default canonical location. Resolve conflicting candidates before writing to them; independent work and conversational drafts can continue.

Read the full file on GitHub · 59 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · -197 lines · +1 tokens per session 55145d806aa3
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 8086eee753ee
  3. 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines · -35 tokens per session 7c34d6ebdb9b
  4. 1mo ago First seen · 247 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A ebe5fe9dc6db

Subscribe to this mod's changes

acceptance-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZeusYue/acceptance-driven-development-skill (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,245 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

adk-go-self-review

Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…

google/adk-go · 87 tokens

adversarial-reviewer

Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…

emdash-cms/emdash · 72 tokens

go-testing

Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 26 tokens

semgrep-rule-variant-creator

Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.

waybarrios/opencode-power-pack · 50 tokens

brooks-sweep

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 178 tokens

plugin-review

Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.

athola/claude-night-market · 23 tokens