Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Zfinix/aster --skill git-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zfinix/asterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zfinix/aster/git-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zfinix/aster/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zfinix/aster/git-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zfinix/aster/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zfinix/aster/git-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00470 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00188 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
git-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Git workflow
- Never use interactive flags. There is no terminal to answer them, so the
command hangs until it is killed. Never:
git rebase -i,git add -i,git add -p,git commitwithout-m. - Disarm the pager.
git --no-pager log,git --no-pager diff, or bound with| head -40. A paged command hangs exactly like an interactive one. - Commit only when the user asked for a commit. Finishing an edit is not permission to commit it.
- Stage named files.
git add src/lib.rs src/tests/lib_test.rs. Nevergit add -Aorgit add .: they sweep in unrelated changes and scratch files. - Conventional commit message, one line.
type(scope): summary, imperative and lowercase, no trailing period. Write:fix(sandbox): keep partial output on timeout. Never a multi-paragraph body unless the user asked for one. - No attribution trailers. Never add
Co-Authored-Byor tool-generated footers unless the user asks. - Branch before touching the default branch. Asked to push while on main/master: create a branch and push that, or ask. Never push to the default branch as a side effect.
- Batch state checks into one call.
bash -lc "git status --short; git log --oneline -5; git diff --stat". - Destructive commands need an explicit ask.
reset --hard,checkout -- .,clean -f,push --force: only when the user asked for that outcome, and state first what will be lost. Preferpush --force-with-leaseover--force.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A eeff6b5f1f19
git-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository Zfinix/aster (129 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 470 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ax-extract-workflow
Reconstruct workflow behind a past coding-agent artifact using local ax sessions/commits/skills/tool traces. Use when asked how X was built.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
chinese-commit-conventions
A Chinese-language guide to Conventional Commits, a format for writing consistent Git commit messages, plus related changelog, commit-checking, and commit-helper configuration.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
run-work
Execute a work unit end-to-end: sequence tasks by dependency, implement, test between tasks, commit, and track progress. Use to deliver a complete feature in one session. Invoked as /agiflow:run-work . Uses getworkunit, listtasks, updatetask, getworkunitprogress.
commit-push-pr
Commit current changes, push to remote, and create or update a pull request. Use when the user wants to commit and create a PR, push changes and open a pull request, or ship their current work as a PR.